Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

At least there it's still linking to the original source where the information is contextualized or correct. GPT-3 will just spit out an answer with no links so you either trust it got it right or you go to google to confirm it basically eliminating the reason to go to GPT in the first place.


Until the source Google points at is a GPT-generated text.

Do we have models yet that identify GPT responses vs. human-authored text? :-)


Sure some day but as far as I understand it there's an "authoritativeness" measure for the info box so there's still a hurdle to get through to become the info box answer.


You can ask GPT to provide links or references to back up its claims, but I haven't been able to get it to return a single working link yet.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: