Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You can simultaneously believe in the need for regulation while being skeptical of those calling for it to entrench their own positions, look what happened with SBF.


There’s a difference between demonstrating the belief of both ideas and dismissing one idea because the other is also true.

So fucking what if what’s his face want regulations for moats? It doesn’t detract for the real need of regulation.

It’s like if letting a baby fall to it’s death because if the main villain gets his hands on it he’ll get unlimited power


Sorry, can you rephrase that? I’m not sure I understand the point you’re trying to make.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: