Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ok. Goodbye chrome. I will be switching to whatever privacy-focused browser allows me to keep not seeing ads.

I do wonder how long it will be before we see browser browsers, software that takes a browser instance and sanitizes it. Maybe chrome will continue as a daemon allowed to run inside a sandbox within a browser's browser that actually displays content to a human.



Welcome to Firefox. We have cookies!


Well yes, but the point is we don't have too much of them.


And ads! Mandatory shortcuts for Nike and Amazon on the homepage! Then ads saying Big Browser Watches For You! Then ads saying we respect privacy! Then a suggestion to open a Mozilla account and synchronize all your history! Because we respect privacy!


Why not change your homepage to something you prefer? And don’t create or sign into a Mozilla account; host your own sync server instead https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34674569


Firefox sync uses end-to-end encryption: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-firefox-sync-keeps-..., https://github.com/mozilla/fxa-auth-server/wiki/onepw-protoc....

There's nothing mandatory about the initial shortcuts - just remove them. It's trivial to change your search engine to Duck Duck Go too.


Errh... I don't see them on mine.

Maybe I removed them or something. If so, it was relatively easy.


Use a non-Mozilla Firefox fork, there's several.


Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.


2 clicks to turn them off mate.


I’ve searched for so long that I found the documentation of Mozilla saying, on the day of the release, that no, the shortcuts on the home page, can’t be removed.

Today I can see that the ads shortcuts can be removed: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/sponsor-privacy

Unfortunately, Firefox is still an ads machine. They keep coming up with “WE PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY” dark patterns to make us gobble up ads.

The worst is getting downvotes every time we point this out. Firefox defenders are extremely bad-faithed, they can’t have a rational discussion about Firefox having mere drawbacks, especially they can’t hear that Firefox misdirects users about privacy and ads.


> The worst is getting downvotes every time we point this out

I didn't down vote you.

No solution is 100% perfect in the tech world. I won't knock them for trying to make some money to keep afloat, even if they aren't (probably) the best at managing money.

I care if I can't turn them off. As you've pointed out, you can do that.

There's no date on your referenced article (pet peeve), so I can't tell when it was done. However it's been a long time (so much I so, I can't even remember) that I've seen ads that I couldn't turn off.


Who's we?


Why not, I'll make a pitch for Brave here too. We have the only EasyList-compatible adblocker that isn't based on an extension platform.

Yes, there is in-browser private advertising with user revenue share, but all of it can be disabled too if you prefer.


Since Brave is Chrome-based, won't it be affected by Chrome's limitations on ad-blockers?


Brave's built-in adblocker will not be affected, since it doesn't rely on any extension APIs.

We'll also be continuing support for Mv2, in case you prefer to use uBO or other pre-Mv3 adblock extensions.


The ads for cryptocurrency grifts in the settings cannot be disabled.


Can you be more specific? There are admittedly lots of settings menus, but to my knowledge there are no ads inside the settings menus.


There are two top-level settings categories advertising the cryptogrift. Brave Rewards and Wallet. Brave Rewards is the second settings category, right after Shields. https://global.discourse-cdn.com/brave/original/3X/6/d/6dc62...


Welcome to Safari!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: