Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It’s a pretty bad look when you are head of the teacher’s advocacy group and think the system is so terrible that your own kids deserve better.

I mean it’s not like I’m the only person who feels this way. It’s something of a scandal and she has taken public heat for this:

https://abc7chicago.com/amp/stacy-davis-gates-private-school...

https://chicago.suntimes.com/education/2023/9/7/23863532/ctu...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/stacy-davis-gates-chicago-teach...



In Chicago, sending your kids to Catholic school is hardly an indictment of the system. It's a very Catholic city. I went to Catholic primary school despite the local CPS K-8 probably being better (and despite my mom teaching there).

She's taking heat for it, obviously, but the heat is motivated: the CTU is intensely political, and has enemies. I'm not a fan. But my point stands: it doesn't really say anything about CPS policy that the head of CTU isn't a CPS customer.


I think at least the head of the group that represents public school teachers could find a single public school worthy of her own children. But apparently not


I'm not sure what you mean. There are obviously CPS schools with exceptional outcomes. I don't think anyone seriously believes that you can't do better than diocesan schools anywhere in CPS. This reads more like a dunk than analysis.


Yes, and the teachers also want better schools. That doesn't mean schools were better in the past.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: