> But that just means you have to compare them with ability of humans to one-shot tasks on the spot, "thinking on their feet", which for most tasks makes even adults look bad compared to GPT-4.
This simply is not true as stated in the article. ARC-AGI is a one-shot task test that humans reliably do much, much better on than any AI model.
> I don't believe someone could learn calc in 100 exercises or less.
I learned the basics of integration in a foreign language I barely understood by watching a couple of diagrams get drawn out and seeing far less than 100 examples or exercises.
This simply is not true as stated in the article. ARC-AGI is a one-shot task test that humans reliably do much, much better on than any AI model.
> I don't believe someone could learn calc in 100 exercises or less.
I learned the basics of integration in a foreign language I barely understood by watching a couple of diagrams get drawn out and seeing far less than 100 examples or exercises.