This is the thing that frustrates me so much about this sort of discussion:
Just because something is legal, it doesn't mean it is ethical.
We keep dismissing ethics as any consideration from business conduct.
It is legal to ignore any and all environmental costs that have not yet been made illegal, so are corporations duty bound to ignore any obvious deleterious consequences as long as there is money to make today? Something feels very wrong about this approach.
Just because something is legal, it doesn't mean it is ethical.
We keep dismissing ethics as any consideration from business conduct.
It is legal to ignore any and all environmental costs that have not yet been made illegal, so are corporations duty bound to ignore any obvious deleterious consequences as long as there is money to make today? Something feels very wrong about this approach.