- The malware used by the group had fingerprints and components of known Iranian, Korean and Russian malware and is a package sold on black market forums.
- The malware used was nearly identical to the that used by the Iranian group who attacked the Aramco oil company in Saudia Arabia in 2012.
- Linguistic analysis of the communications by #GOP suggest a native Russian author.
- SONY had given the US State Department a preview of The Interview in July 2014 (after the Mundt-Smith anti-propaganda law was immolated) and SONY was contracting with RAND Corporation specialist Bruce Bennett, a specialist on nuclear deterrence (NK is a nuclear state) and North Korea.
- Leaked emails with Bennett have him discussing the effectiveness of the movie to cause instability in North Korea.
Now McAfee is claiming the group had anti-trust motivations?
Err... what? Maybe I'm dense, but if you want to cause instability in a dictatorship, a blatantly Hollywood-style comedy movie where some American dudes kill the nation's leader in a graphically gruesome fashion is not what I'd expect. If anything, it will help North Korean propaganda. ("See those American Imperialists insult our great country! Death to America!")
Besides, how many North Koreans would ever see this movie, anyway?
If there is anyone in doubt in NK about their glorious leader, seeing this film may just push them over the edge, knowing that the assassination of their leader is something that the world wants. Plus, there's more to the movie than just assassination - its also a reflection of the condition of the North Korean people, and the constraints placed upon their lives by a repressive regime. Sometimes all thats needed to push the needle into the red-zone of revolution is a reminder that things are not always as they seem; while I personally think its a stupid movie from a purile industry, my opinion doesn't matter here. The North Korean people have to decide for themselves if they can do something about their dire circumstances, and what to do.. perhaps this movie will plant some hints in someones mind, and something will get done about it.
(Disclaimer: I'm no fan of Hollywood being used as a tool for propaganda against us by our own imperial, authoritarian masters, either.. its a double-edged sword..)
Besides, how many North Koreans would ever see this movie, anyway?
The number is not zero. According to a PBS Frontline documentary, there are smugglers that bring video players, USB thumb drives, and DVDs with movies into North Korea.
Well, your analysis differs from the North Korean specialists and the State Department.
From the leaked SONY emails:
“The North has never executed an artillery attack against the balloon launching areas. So it is very hard to tell what is pure bluster from North Korea, since they use the term ‘act of war’ so commonly,” wrote Bennett. “I also thought a bunch more about the ending. I have to admit that the only resolution I can see to the North Korean nuclear and other threats is for the North Korean regime to eventually go away.”
“In fact, when I have briefed my book on ‘preparing for the possibility of a North Korean collapse’ [Sept 2013], I have been clear that the assassination of Kim Jong-Un is the most likely path to a collapse of the North Korean government. Thus while toning down the ending may reduce the North Korean response, I believe that a story that talks about the removal of the Kim family regime and the creation of a new government by the North Korean people (well, at least the elites) will start some real thinking in South Korea and, I believe, in the North once the DVD leaks into the North (which it almost certainly will). So from a personal perspective, I would personally prefer to leave the ending alone.”
As far as it leaking into NK, South Korean activists had promised publicly that they would fly some via the balloons Bennett mentions in the quote.
Further leaked conversation with Lynton (CEO) confirm that senior State Department officials agree with Bennett's analysis.
Oh, and executives asked Dan Sterling (the script writer) to change his character from a non-descript anonymous leader of North Korea to Kim Jong-Un and a member of the Kim family specifically.
I think there's a pretty good case that North Korean sympathizers were involved in the hack. Despite current 'folklore' that the original hacks were about a ransom this appears to come from early reporting where news headlines read that data was being held ransom for demands and it was sort of just assumed to be monetary.
The pastebins and messages from #GOP themselves are concerned about the 'movie of terrorism' and promised to give a Christmas gift to those following the leaks. The Christmas gift was leaked email conversations between CEO Lynton and strategic state specialists and where several mentions are made about the involvement of the State Department in the analysis of the movie.
To complicate things though the malware used had seen previous use in Iranian attacks against Saudi oil companies and linguistic analysis suggests that the author of the #GOP messages was likely a native Russian speaker.
- The malware used was nearly identical to the that used by the Iranian group who attacked the Aramco oil company in Saudia Arabia in 2012.
- Linguistic analysis of the communications by #GOP suggest a native Russian author.
- SONY had given the US State Department a preview of The Interview in July 2014 (after the Mundt-Smith anti-propaganda law was immolated) and SONY was contracting with RAND Corporation specialist Bruce Bennett, a specialist on nuclear deterrence (NK is a nuclear state) and North Korea.
- Leaked emails with Bennett have him discussing the effectiveness of the movie to cause instability in North Korea.
Now McAfee is claiming the group had anti-trust motivations?
The SONY hack gets more and more interesting.