Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more AlexCornila's commentslogin

I went there for undergrad and trust me it’s the hunger games. I remember for one class, DSP we would have labs before they would actually teach the material and as a student you were how the Fck can I achieve whatever the lab is asking with the knowledge we learned so far… you couldn’t and it would take a couple of labs to realize that material req was from next class.


looks like one … and works for the emotionally manipulative ones


Assuming true how is this actually related to Telegram … ohh it isn’t its just a way to better handle pushbacks, he’s a bad guy anyway


yeah but if I get a 4.25% FDIC insured I’ll prefer that and take the 0.75% loss. https://www.crisesnotes.com/i-got-the-fed-to-release-its-201...


You can get higher than that w/ fdic too. I use wealthfront and it's been great so far. Currently 5%


What’s the FDIC going to do for you when the treasuries it uses to hold its own funds are in default?


FDIC is going to return my funds defaulted treasuries are not required to do so


As far as I know, the US Treasury and FDIC are both under a legal obligation but either could be unable to fulfill its obligation if it lacks the funds. Under this scenario where the Treasury defaults, tons of banks will will be broken (since they keep money in the Treasury too), how will FDIC save them when its money is also tied up in treasuries?



Holding t-bills means you pay neither state nor local taxes, so the net difference is likely larger than 0.75% depending on where you live.


Is it possible to buy t-bills whilst avoiding the Treasury Direct website?



And what are the causes for the loss of community ?



this meaning no 1) is the right answer


Amazed that the author can even make this claim without affecting his/her reputation/credibility more broadly. Simply if that were the case we could’ve afford to pay for college from fixed income without the need to access loans. Second you wouldn’t have the loan crisis where the debt accelerates way above income. This is just plain dumb.


One can have whatever interpretation of the data it wants but I’d like to see the raw data they used; this is gaslighting.


this sounds like the ego of a 13 years old, with no power nor wealth.


they see evil capitalists under every stone because under a amoral economic system and a high enough number of “capitalists” resorting to mischievous ways to turn a buck that’s a precautionary principle


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: