Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | CommenterPerson's commentslogin

> but I think he wants to be seen as naive

Where does this need come from, to be skeptical or suspicious? Of someone so clearly above board?

Wozniak doesn't need to prove himself to anyone. Maybe he feels comfortable enough in his shoes to be very open about himself, and so motivate people to be true to themselves. At least that's my interpretation.


The referenced study is from the New England Journal of Medicine, which is pretty respectable, and is a large study. It says the wealthiest 25% of Americans have a worse mortality than the poorest 25% of Europeans.

They have health insurance managed by government, not for profit industry.

Nothing to do with communism, as some of the hacker bros are venting. That's just propaganda to keep people slaving at shitty jobs for less pay and lousy benefits.


Non-hacker here. The title says "modern". I don't need modern, have a 10 year old phone, can I still get the occasional simple app from F-Droid?

I upped my (small) monthly contribution. Hope more people contribute, and also work to build public support.

Also, for developers .. please include old fashioned credit cards as a payment method. I'd like to contribute but don't want to sign up for yet another payment method.


Corporations have figured out that enshittification works .. it increases revenue and profit. Same with surveillance capitalism.

Some of this feels like fun stuff for us techies but it will bite us and the next gen.

The only way to fix it is to vote for decent regulations.


Yes. Also "Live science.com finds multi-billion year old click bait in NASA report".

Thank you for stating this so simply and clearly.

It's absurd to see so many commenters, who are probably mostly wage earners, mindlessly repeat the right wing propaganda. Civilization needs some minimum decency.


Thank you. When the head of the labor stats department is fired for reporting labor stats (she has a PhD), when the head of the public health agency is a vaccine skeptic lawyer .. I know where we in the US are headed.

"Relative to employment in the fast food sector elsewhere in the United States" .. could drive a truck through that "elsewhere".

In 1992, New Jersey made just such an increase in minimum wage at fast food restaurants. Card & Kreuger ("Myth and Measurement") analyzed data in adjacent areas in NJ & PA. They found that employment in the NJ area actually increased. Take a look at the first chapter of "Economics in America" by Angus Deaton (Nobel 2015).

Comparing CA to elsewhere in the US (where? everywhere?) looks a bit shady. Given the government agencies are being led by political hacks these days, I don't trust it one bit.


Circa 1992 would the area be increasing in population and so employees to service that volume?

Yeah and tell me America is great at this. Where a authoritarian sacks a government official for publishing government stats. Wonderfully democratic TACO state.

America has constitutional protections for freedom of speech, that are greater than any other country. I mean that literally. The government official was not sacked for “publishing government stats” - that is, it’s not their speech as an individual that led to their firing.

And I have no idea what you mean by “TACO state”.


Sorry, Americas constitutional protections are effectively a myth. There is nothing to enforce or even defend them. They are theory at best, easy to be twisted any time powerful enough person wants.

You should try watching some auditors on the tube of your choice. They make good money suing when their rights are violated. I wish individuals had that protection in Canada.

How is it a myth? Anyone can say what they want, barring a small set of exceptions like defamation. This is enforced and defended by the legal system. It’s the opposite of what you are claiming.

The power of literal government agencies are used against people and organizations literally based on their speech. Literally over words.

Meanwhile, literal financial political corruption is framed as speech.

And second, give how expensive civil suits are, you not having enough money to pay layers means that slapp suits are very effective limits on free speech in practice.


Couldn't you make that argument for any law in any society?

Sure, which is why the value of such a law should be judged based on how well it's enforced, and not merely how often it's espoused.

I think the point is, despite America having "constitutional protections for freedom of speech, that are greater than any other country," it has fallen to such a sorry state that a government officer is fired for reporting inconvenient numbers and that's not even the craziest thing the president did this week.

...which raises question on whether "freedom of speech" is the great defense against authoritarianism Americans believe it to be.


Yes it obviously is a great defense against authoritarianism. Trump still can’t stop you as an individual in exercising your freedom of speech. A government “officer” here is just an employee (of an agency that is controlled by the president), fired for doing their job poorly (allegedly), not for speech.

Totally agree. It doesn't seem limited to EU results btw. I added a bookmark on the toolbar and will be searching there first. Enough already will surveillance capitalism!

https://www.ecosia.org/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: