So that I can operate two windows/tabs of the same site in parallel without them stealing each other’s scroll position. In addition, the second window/tab may have originated from duplicating the first one.
Yes, but how do you garbage-collect the stored per-tab state from the local storage? Note that it’s not just per tab, but per history entry of the tab. (When the user goes back, they want the respective state to be restored, and again when going forward in reverse.) Furthermore, with browser features like “reopen closed tab”. Better let the browser manage the state implicitly by managing the URLs.
If your definition is: an ad that explicitly involves a party/politician, why?
It seems like they're going to happen regardless, the difference is the subtly. For example, there's a lot of accounts purposefully pushing ideologies, and focusing on specific events for a political purpose on social media.
Arguably, these are much more dangerous than explicit political ads.
I'm not sure it's fair to separate "AI Slop" with "Buy my crap" marketing.
People will monetize one way or another. It may be more or less explicit with AI slop.
Additionally, I would challenge "AI slop posing a problem": AI Agents and automation of content keeps people engaged inside of a platform, inside of a niche. A democratization may lead to more expensive ad space.
Meta can certainly assist in creating slop and maintaining conversational salespersons
> Meta can certainly assist in creating slop and maintaining conversational salespersons
They absolutely can and you could’ve said the same about Stack Overflow or Quora. But in the end those platforms fizzled once AI began to democratize the creation of “good-enough” answers. The same trajectory likely awaits Instagram as AI-generated videos reach parity with user-made ones, the distinction between creator and consumer will blur. The shift is inevitable if the technology doesn't hit a wall.
Maybe companies like OpenAI will make even more money by licensing the technology that keeps us entertained, but the influencer economy will eventually collapse. I’m not saying what’s coming is necessarily better, I’m just saying Meta’s platforms are in for a rough ride.
I believe Stack Overflow and Quora were screwed because chatbot interfaces became the new entrypoint. _If_ Instagram/TikTok/YouTube manage to stay the place people go habitually, then I think they will benefit, not be harmed. But there are probably many ways to step wrong here. There is a bit of an innovators dilemma for the platforms that currently relies on human produced content. If I were them, I would fund 2-3 new/separate efforts to be able to experiment while not immediately killing the current golden goose.
We had 'Asian road chaos' every fall where the rich ones would show up with their new Bugattis (edit: Maseratis) having never learned how to drive the thing and much less on the open American roads where you can really let the accelerator loose. They would cause endless crashes.
One or two of poor ones would end up committing suicide in the spring when they flunked out and had spent their entire little farming family's fortune back in some austere rice farming village.
It was quite the sight to see. I want to say they were fairly normal in intelligence, relatively, but the set of incentives for them to perform were wildly different.
I was being generous when I wrote the comment. Several of the internationals left me baffled about how they got there. The liberal HN audience here clearly has an axe to grind.
That still doesn't mean your experiences generalise in any useful way, and using phrases like 'liberal HN audience' only serves to highlight your own biases.
This one isn't quite saying its cheaper, or even charging, I think you might get a laugh if you click through. I don't think we'll need to worry about the costs being cranked after lock-in.
Is the word baas so horrified to people that they won't even click on the link to see that the code is a MASSIVE 1k loc (just using irony hehe)
But in all seriousness, I may be going on a tangent but I don't think that anybody can monetize code under less than 1k loc. Are there any cool examples anybody want to share?
Maybe "simple" api's would generally be the only thing that would be more monetizable and still fall under less than 1k loc. But still I would love hearing more about this kind of thing.
There are smart contracts in the Ethereum and Binance network making millions a day extracting transaction fees with much less than 1k loc. The code is even public.
Can you give me some examples. Also I personally feel as if most of these are saturated and I don't think that I could earn a million with such loc. and maybe its me but personally I don't like touching most crypto since its grift. And the only one I'd like is monero for privacy but I doubt how much I need it anyway.
>Start cheap, gather market, then crank the costs after lock-in.
"cost"/"price" vocabulary clarification, should you ever want to read or write business plans, communicate with accountants, CFO's, etc.
"costs" are what companies pay for supplies/inputs that the company purchases.
"prices" are what those same companies offer to charge buyers for the products the company sells.
companies want to keep costs down, and companies benefit from high prices. (when you said "crank the costs", it thunks)
since people don't generally operate their lives as companies, it tends to seem like "costs" and "prices" are the same thing, but in addition to the above, "costs" to a company reflect actual expenditures in total, and "prices" represent an advertisement for each of something pending that has not transacted yet.
"cost" is an accounting term, total revenues - total costs = total profits
"price" is a marketing term, $1 each, $10 for a dozen!
(of course this could be quibbled into incomprehensively, which is another thing you should not do in "business communication", always streamline communication to get to the takeaway as quickly as possible)
reply