Not exactly sure why you are paying for Claude Pro, doesn't GH Copilot Pro give you Claude Opus 4.5 (which I'm assuming you are using since it is SOTA for now). OpenCode lets you use GH Copilot, so you can use OpenCode's ACP adapter and plug it into the IDE

Antigravity also gives access to Opus 4.5, and OpenCode lets use Antigravity APIs too.

i dont think you need to select name and size, you can just remove it and use `select -first 4`, but cool, I never knew about `/=` syntax

I was trying to replicate the nushell example, which only has name and size in the output.

well it is cool, but im missing the point of it, why?

pushing pixels.

I never liked Wacom tablets or the (Fujitsu) touchscreen on my laptop. worked in design and graphics environments that gave me a few of them for free and it wasn’t for me.

This is one of the ideas I wish worked well for me but I loathed it. And would maybe revisit.

Still clutching to the mouse and still clutching to photoshop 30 years later, I’d change either one out if I enjoyed their replacement.

> Opus 4.5 ate theough my Copilot quota last month

Sure, Copilot charges 3x tokens for using Opus 4.5, but, how were you still able to use up half the allocated tokens not even one week into January?

I thought using up 50% was mad for me (inline completions + opencode), that's even worse

I have no idea. Careless use, I guess. I was fixing a bunch of mocks in some once-great but now poorly maintained code, and I wasn't really feeling it so I just fed everything to Claude. Opus, unfortunately. I could easily have downgraded a bit.

Doesn't Helix support debuggers via the Debug Adapter Protocol (DAP)?

The animation isn't even in the background...

Seems like everyone is interested in Rust, but yours was written in Go.

Why does the implementation language of a TUI matter?

mise is pretty nice, though I don't use it for python, Python is handled by uv with poethepoet as the task runner.

Can you help me understand what the value or use case of poethepoet is?

It allows you to define common tasks such as linting, running tests, building docs, etc under an alias.

So you can run

uv run poe docs

Instead of

uv run sphinx-build -W -b dirhtml docs/source docs/build

Many languages have a task runners baked into their package manager, but many others don’t. In Ruby it’s roughly the equivalent of Rake.

I think the question being asked is, if you’re already using mise (which has a built-in task runner) what is the advantage of going with the other one?

FWIW mise has a task runner built-in too.

Happy New Year from Singapore!

Finally got my first GitHub repo to 100 stars (yesterday!) so that is something I'm really dang proud of. This year, I do have my Cambridge A Level Examinations coming up, hopefully I don't mess it up as bad as I did for my O Level Exams...

The creator of Toad, made a TUI framework in Python (Textual). What is so special about Rust, aside from it being blazingly fast and compiled, that you want from it?

Safety, performance, avoiding python dependency hell.

I tried Toad and to me it feels ridiculously slow and laggy. Switching between input and output (ALT+up/down) for example just lags, I can notice the transition. The whole UI lags. It's no wonder, it's python. Simply the wrong language for this, sorry.

Sure, to each their own. No one forced you to use it, you have a thing called free will, and you can gladly use it.