They didn't account for a corporatocracy.

Was in the same boat! Just got approved literally 2 days ago. And I have tons of activity...

No it's not lmao. It's that the institution is the one who fills out your fucking paychecks. If I pay you to clean the kitchen, but you want to clean the bathroom, and I tell you to clean the kitchen and not clean the bathroom or you're fired, and you decide to clean the bathroom, what exactly do you think should happen?

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03742 Code: https://github.com/Chakazul/Lenia

Agreed. If it's even close to a no no word it should be banned completely. No more riggers, naggers, poggers, biggas, lucks, bunts, minks, bikes, or trikes. This is a doubleplusgood plan.

Maybe usernames in general should require a higher entropy than words in a dictionary :D

Path in the leak is: safety-ml\offensive-usernames\data_pull\sql\bad.sql

Highlights:

    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION is_tragedy (VARCHAR) RETURNS BOOLEAN STABLE AS $$
     SELECT replace($1,'_','') LIKE '%george%floyd%'
    $$ LANGUAGE SQL;

    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION is_derogatory (VARCHAR) RETURNS BOOLEAN STABLE AS $$
     SELECT replace($1,'_','') LIKE '%retard%'
    $$ LANGUAGE SQL;

Now we know we can make as many goergefloyd accounts as we want! *devious grin* *chuckles to self*

safety-ml - I assume this is some attempt at training a machine learning algorithm to find bad names.

This is what investors and the public buy as AI.

A hand coded if statement

More accurate then actual AI under-trained on insufficient data.

Dispicable language. 'Rart' has no place on HN.

This is exactly the kind of thinking these people count on.

> Lena Pietsch, Facebook’s director of policy communications. “We don’t agree with her characterization of the many issues she testified about. Despite all this, we agree on one thing; it’s time to begin to create standard rules for the internet. It’s been 25 years since the rules for the internet have updated, and instead of expecting the industry to make societal decisions that belong to legislators, it is time for Congress to act.”

Legislation usually fortifies the positions of companies like Facebook, especially since there is so much mingling between big tech and Washington. Facebook isn't the internet and perhaps her own comapany is in need of it.