I don't think the structure means that the designer is not shared. I think it means that they don't change the designer between asks, unless the original is unavailable.
Which makes sense IMO, then the designer can take on as many clients as they have bandwidth for.
Shuffling is recommended over hopping because you're less likely to fall over. Shuffle in small movements keeping your feet on the ground and close together.
For what its worth, this table only goes to 2017, all are either operational or cancelled. So this doesn't suggest that there are _new_ coal plants being proposed/considered.
Not really sure why this was submitted or what makes it interesting.
Code size has not grown as fast as memory and storage capacity has. One is constrained by manufacturing progress, the other is constrained by programmer output.
Deno is sub 50MB
For any non trivial app, your assets and working set data will likely dwarf the code size itself.
EDIT: Was looking at an old bug, deno is closer to 100MB. Starting to feel a bit large but still.
I'd take this with a grain of salt for the time being. "Google contemplated" could mean nothing more than a random exec said this in passing or as a joke once to somebody else.
Not to mention no internal and communications are cited in the article.
You don't need to validate the hostnamez you can safely leave that for name resolution libraries. You just need to properly separate the user info from the host name and port. Which is pretty simply defined in the grammar.
That depends on your use case. If you're trying to check the hostname against some sort of whitelist or blacklist you're going to want to normalize it. Then you have all kinds of fun like IDN to deal with.