Lots of comments here suggesting forwarding emails from the external account to Gmail as a workaround for this.
This isn't a complete workaround though. In particular, the option to delete the email from your server after retrieving it will not be replaceable. At least cPanel doesn't seem to offer the option to delete automatically after forwarding, and you could argue it shouldn't - with a push, you never know if the other end actually got it, unlike with a pull.
This is such an annoying part of the tax incentive.
It's a huge, pointless gift to car dealers (who need no help) because it means they don't have to compete for price with private sellers or buyers. If I have a used EV to sell, I basically have to sell to the dealer because no buyer wants to bother buying from me when they can get the same thing from a dealer with a $4k tax credit on top.
KeySavvy is the normal workaround for this. $99 extra cost to both sides for them to handle the title verification and shipping, and to act as the dealer to make it qualify for EV credits.
Maybe the car dealers have had a lobbyist that has influenced this to their favor. Wouldn't surprise me. But likewise, there's some formality and paperwork trails that exist when a dealership is involved vs. private party, so I wonder if the concern is some fraud or abuse in the private market as well. Regardless, I agree with you.
Right, set too low (imho). And not a graduated phase out either. And the market for these cars are going to be people typically past the income limit. My instinct tells me that people below the income limit ($75K/$150K) probably aren't really in the market for an EV. They are probably just trying to keep their regular gas vehicle running. An EV is almost a second/third car for a lot of people, commuters trying to offset their gasoline costs.
Individual tax credits/deductions shouldn't have income limits / phaseout at all. We get the progressive taxation on the front end, with marginal tax brackets.
This kind of thing makes we wonder if the internet as a whole is heading for a Kessler Syndrome kind of situation.
Another example: here in the USA we have 50 states vying to each regulate AI; my understanding is that the plan was to have the OBBB put them off from doing this for at least 10 years, but that effort failed, leaving them free to each do their own thing.
Complying with all rules and regulations in all jurisdictions to which a website/service could be exposed (i.e. worldwide, by default) seems like it's becoming a well nigh impossible task these days.
Balkanization was always the inevitable end state of the Internet, because the alternative is ceding sovereignty over what is now critical infrastructure, and states simply do not do that.
It was fine when the Internet was a side hobby for a slice of the population, but now that it’s fundamental to all aspects of life, having it under the control of a foreign government (and the tech companies which act as de facto organs of that government) is no longer acceptable.
Well, if we make it expensive enough to operate everywhere, then there will probably be one or two huge "global" sites and hundreds of small local, region-locked ones. Maybe that is the future.
Cyberspace is not, eventually, independent[1] if you plan to make money off it and use real world IDs.
I could see that happening... perhaps instead of plugging in the URL of the MCP server you'd like to use, you'd just put in the URL of their online documentation and trust your AI assistant of choice to go through all of it.
> Ice cream was important for morale. In 1942, the U.S.S. Lexington was slowly sinking from a Japanese torpedo attack, before the crew abandoned ship, they broke into the freezer and ate all the ice cream. Survivors describe scooping ice cream into their helmets and licking them clean before lowering themselves into the Pacific.
I would agree with that if there were no distinction between clients and servers. i.e. agents and LLMs are resources that should be discovered and exploited in the same exact way as anything else, and switchable in the same ways.
The whole thing reminds me of stuff like Alan Kay's legendary OOPSLA talk in 1997 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKg1hTOQXoY ) "Every object should have an IP" (Also "Arrogance in computer science is measured in nano Dijkstras").
i think the problem is in business process, it´s created for no work automatic, the people need be on control OR need have block because well if all people try cancel your subscription and can go in one step with a simple prompt, this is a huge revenue loss.
look how all companies have super system for crm/sales but when you go to backoffice all run in sheets and sometimes in real paper.
This could be true... but only if there is an actual specific problem that they can put their finger on that requires the device to be AI-first. What is that problem exactly?
It's also not obvious to me that a concerted effort by Apple (unlike what we've seen so far, admittedly) wouldn't eventually be successful in converting the iPhone to something effectively indistinguishable from a platform designed from the ground up to be "AI-first".
Designing things from the ground up is hard by the way. It's not just the design itself; it's the ecosystems around them which are really hard to get going. Apple has the world's biggest flywheel in motion there already.
This isn't a complete workaround though. In particular, the option to delete the email from your server after retrieving it will not be replaceable. At least cPanel doesn't seem to offer the option to delete automatically after forwarding, and you could argue it shouldn't - with a push, you never know if the other end actually got it, unlike with a pull.
reply