Love this. I was super scared the first time i was booking travel to Europe with a newish girlfriend.

If you’re doing intentional travel with a significant other you should probably already be at the “pooping with the door open” phase.

Married with baby here—this is not a phase. Baby is the only one comfortable pooping with the door open.

There was definitely a layer of humor intended here, if you didn’t pick up on it.

Maybe not literally pooping with the door open but I can’t say I’d want to travel internationally with someone who I’m not comfortable with normal bodily functions around.

In my long dating years, I've never pooped my bathroom door open. Never even farted next to a girl. Is this disgusting behavior normal to some people?

I had 4yr+ relationships. I am a shy pooper; I can't poop when someone watches me, while I fart or potentially destroy the toilet bowl. And also, there is the smell. Is "giving them full self" going full ape? Not judging, I am just curious, I don't talk about this with my other friends usually. Most guys don't share these weird details; it does not come up.

There was meant to be a layer of humor in my comments…

Maybe not everyone literally poops with the door open with their significant other but I’d personally have a hard time marrying someone who couldn’t exchange farts for a laugh.

I don't have a rigorous study to back my feelings, but I am pretty sure most people actually prefer to avoid their partner's farts and toilet smells.

I think this is a pretty common approach nowadays, and one of the reasons why I believe my job is safe for now. I expect to be called up to fix some of the resulting mess. It's a two-edged sword, for sure.

You still will have to maintain it then though.

Now you have shifted your supply chain issues to your coding agent.

And do you think the severity of the issue is anywhere near the same?

I think this will remain to be seen. Wasn't there a paper linked here on HN recently, that claimed, that even few examples are sufficient, to poison LLMs? (I didn't read that paper, and merely interpreted the meaning of the title.)

I don't think it remains to be seen. I think it's obvious that the completely explicit exploit is going to be more effective.

The existing Yelp integration is so bad. Want to see a picture larger, or read more than 10 words of a review it opens Yelp app which usually doesn't work.

I expect gcp and azure to gain some customers after this

Older/earlier iOS was more simple, intuitive, and usable from my point of view (mid 30s tech oriented male). Now even i find myself getting lost in the endless settings menus and too many different home screen / option screen / extra screens. I don't even use MacOS Launchpad. Just give me a desktop, window manager, and simple notifications.

I dread the day my older mom updates her iOS and calls me for help.

What really has been added in terms of endless menus? Control Center was like 2013, Widgets were like 2014. Today, 90% of things are still controlled via the settings app, except for a few app-specific settings that are controlled via the specific app. The latest iOS has some rougher edges, but I can't see how it's confusing.

Here is a practical example: When I simply want to switch wifi networks at home or work or the coffee shop, or I want to disconnect my car from bluetooth and go with just my AirPods (for a private call with the kids in the car), it takes more than 3-4 clicks to do the "right thing" from that slide down menu.

The UI reaction feels more delayed now. If i'm in the middle of a call and want to go private, or some how got connected to the slow network, and i want to switch to the other one.

I feel like I used to be able to do it with 2 or 3 simple clicks. Now i cant remember if i need to click once, or click and hold, and by then the animation changed and now I tapped again and its doing something i did not expect.

For me personally, I used to be a wiz at navigating this phone on older OS versions - and now i feel like a klutz and it doesn't do the thing I expected anymore.

Not to nitpick, but just because it's the example you gave: Wi-Fi settings in the control center are the same as they have been for years (or easier, as I don't remember the dropdown menu in the earliest versions).

The UX paradigm of a tap for the primary function and a press for alternate functions (for Wi-Fi: On/off, or to select networks) is the same across much of iOS, including Safari and 3rd party apps.

Admittedly it's not the best for discoverability, and the elimination of Haptic Touch has made it slightly more awkward to trigger, but it's not a totally new behavior to learn.

Are you on a significantly older device that might be having some performance issues? Supposedly the new glass UI is heavier and could be slowing down the device enough to cause issues.

Don’t you just need to put the AirPods in your ears for them to connect to the phone (and for the phone to switch from the car automatically?) Unless you’re always wearing them while driving..

It’s still 3 clicks for both operations (slide from corner, 1. Tap the wireless cluster where there’s a group of four small icons, 2. Tap either WiFi or Bluetooth where there’s a list with up/down arrows. 3. Select from that list)

On OSX there is a bug where if you have automatic ear detection on, even with latest AirPods, it will connect back properly but the OS will not switch the output to it, but it will think it did. You will have to turn off bluetooth and turn it back on again, even disconnecting from airpod and reconnecting doesn't fix it.

I mean, Apple software quality has gotten so abyssmal, I haven't updated TailScale to latest version because when it updates, briefly a notification appears telling me to go into settings to approve something but even when I click that notification, it doesn't take me there. And I know the location it is talking about, when I go there, there are no pending requests.

It is all so tiresome. Except for battery life, it is literally a terrible platform now. And just several years ago, it was light-years ahead.

Don’t get me started on the new mobile safari UI

the fact that it allows more screen space for content is appreciated, but the way it was forced on everyone pisses me off.

You can change it in settings -> Apps -> Safari, under the "Tabs" section - "Bottom" is like what it used to be. I immediately switched to that after the update to 26, but once I realized you could swipe up from the address bar to get to the tab view, I switched back so I could get more content space.

I don't like that it's two taps to get to the share button now though.

I never understood why folks use Traefik. HAProxy feels more configurable and resilient.

Low resource footprint, written in Go, embed-able in any Go project as a library, compiles to mobile with little to no modification, supports config change without restart, has plugin API.

These were the reasons why we used it in my previous job.

Integrates with Docker Compose with the its Docker config provider so I can configure Traefik for my services through Docker labels, not in the central Traefik instance

HAProxy's documentation is pretty bad (almost entirely of the style "here are all the parameters and options available, no concrete complete examples)".

Traefik has easy to parse docs with lots of examples, and mostly, it can autoconfigure itself based on a variety of sources. You can point it to your Kubernetes or Nomad or Consul, (and with small bits of info given when deploying your workloads to those places), and it just works.

Yeah, this is absolutely true. It can be configured to do anything, which means you really need to make sure you've configured everything correctly.

Because Traefik is lightweight and if you know Go, it can be even easier to get going as you can browse the source code and figure things out.

HAproxy on the other hand is the big daddy of proxies. The pinnacle of high performance. There are few use cases where this makes sense. Definitely nothing for development environments.

I use it because it's built in to k3s.

Easy to configure, straightforward and intuitive. Clear and detailed documentation. Recently, I wanted to try HAProxy, but I gave up because I got lost in the config, and I don't trust AI agents to do things I don't understand.

Easy to configure.

We use Kong, and while it is quite powerful, oh boy better get some coffee when doing those rules.

That’s salesforce for you! My employer left slack due to 7 figure bill for seats that were 10 times smaller due to shrinking company.

If they are going to be making Billions in net income every year going forward, as many years as analysts can make projections for, and using these works allowed them to GTM faster/quicker/gain advantage against competitors, then it is quite great from a business prospective.

their own L1 chain that supports the same EVM contracts that eth supports? WoW