The hosted demo isn't looking past the summary of the wiki article. If you follow the instructions on the README and run it locally it will have a much larger pool of answers/choices.
yeah it is a pretty good source for learning SEO, but everytime they teach you something they do it using their own paid tool. My problem with them is that they recommend their own tool in all of their articles and don't care about what tool I am currently using. I don't mind using a paid tool, I am currently using SEMRush.
It's amazing what you can achieve just by using HTML and CSS, but still I wonder why we mostly see websites with generic design and layout that only use common HTML and CSS elements.
Umm Compatibility reasons? It's probably also much easier to create certain things using a full range of tools rather than trying to implement it purely in css
Also because commonality of user experience has great value in satisfying the principle of least astonishment. It's true that a lot of web devs and designers don't get this right, but that's no reason to suggest they shouldn't be trying.
I think this work is valuable, but this is more R&D type work than a lot of people who are actually producing work with immediate value results, and tied to a business need
There are websites where you share your twitter or facebook page and users their will follow/like your page in exchange for you to do the same for their page...exchanging likes/follows. After few days these users will unlike or unfollow you to keep their follower/following ratio balanced.
