There are plenty of tools for organizing activities. Meetup’s real value, which no one has replaced yet for various reasons, is in getting new people to join.
One more to add from the early days: widespread use of , the character entity for a non-breaking space.
They were used to move text to the right to the left within a container. Or (IIRC) in table cells to make them behave, similar to 1x1 spacer gifs. Some pages had hundreds of nsps. Just kind of a general way to add margin or padding.
Crazy idea: a red team for hire that tries to scam your relatives (but doesn’t actually go through with it). Seems like the most effective way to teach people what to look out for.
It's worth noting that betaveros won several previous Advents of Code without using Noulith. You can't attribute too much of this year's success to the language. Still, it's pretty cool, and I've really enjoyed reading his solutions. Noulith feels like walking through a syntactic candy store and eating whatever you want.
Including winning 2021 and 2020! I'd guess that exclusively using a new programming language that you recently invented is actually an impediment to speed, though apparently not a significant enough one.
I agree. One additional detail to notice is the use of horizontal space. There are several different widths being used, depending on the type of content. (I'm on desktop.) I like the varying "full-width" image sizes, as well as the footnotes on the side. But most exciting to me is how the content gets wider for side-by-side image and text components, such as the early MS-DOS CLI screenshot. This component uses the extra horizontal space that it needs to, while maintaining flow with the rest of the writing above and below it. It's elegant and I believe it's an innovation. After experiencing this post, the typical blog or article layout crammed into a fixed-size column seems straitjacketed. It's inspiring.
This isn't true, and also makes no sense. (How would he have paid taxes? What money would the police have seized?) Speaking from first-hand experience, there's a significant community of collectors who like and will buy Shvembldr's work.
Two things that might help. First is acknowledging that the benefit of a joke isn't just the humor, it's making yourself look funny. If you notice and factor out the part of you that wants to seem funny, fewer jokes will cross the threshold of being worth saying. (Maybe 10% fewer. :) The second is the understanding that jokes disrupt a conversation. A conversation is a collective effort that creates a certain mood, and unless entertainment is the main goal of the conversation, then jokes have a cost. They hinder people from what they're trying to do.
> People have made money by selling virtual goods acquired in-game at least as far back as Second Life in 2005.
I saw it happening at least as far back as ‘98 in DragonRealms, a MUD and (when it moved off of AOL) one of the first online games with a monthly subscription.
That doesn't come off as "lazy research" to me. The author didn't write "the earliest time this happened was 2005", but rather "at least as far back as ....".
The author's correct in their wording, and the point was simply that getting real money out of games in some way is not novel to this new "play to earn" genre.
The point of the article was to talk about Axie Infinity and Bullshit Jobs in the present, not to spend significant time on historical background.
To be honest, I think using Second Life, or runescape, or such as an example, instead of Ultima Online or such, actually is better writing in that it's more likely to be something the audience is familiar with, or at least can google and read more about. In that sense, using a well known historical example is less lazy writing than finding the oldest possible thing that others are unlikely to relate to for a peripheral comparison which already explicitly was worded as "at least as early as" ("kinda old, but not necessarily the oldest").
