They may be partnering with them but support for competitve titles is rather limited. For example, the most prominent Battleye title (iirc), Rainbow Six Siege, is not support on Linux via Steam due to Battleye blocking it. Valorant, LoL, BF6 or CoD also don't work ime.
Particularly frustrating, because Rainbow Six Siege runs spectacularly on linux, but the moment you join a multiplayer session the anticheat forces a crash-to-desktop.
For many of these games it's a choice. They choose not to support linux. Perhaps one day that will change.
I've been playing online multiplayer games, including competitive FPS and more, for nearly 3 decades. Cheating has never been such a problem that it made me quit a game. So much of this is way overplayed by wannabe-super-sweat try-hards, thinking they're competing in high-stakes games.
So we cede more and more control of our computer over to video game(!!) companies, going deep down the rabbit hole of kernel-level anti-cheat and worse to come.
It's a freaking video game... have fun. If someone cheats, find a new server. It's really that simple.
They will need to sooner or later. Linux has more momentum than ever, and saying "players on steam deck/steam machine/bazzite can't play our game" seems like a losing long term strategy.
So, the problem with anticheat on Linux is there's no "safe" reference version of Linux that you can enforce to be running. This is a good thing. It's supposed to be modifiable. This fundamentally conflicts with the goal of anticheat which is to stop you modifying it.
I predict they won't allow all Linux but only the specific version Valve puts on the Steam Deck/Machine, and if you modify it then your games won't run again.
It's a balance between allowing linux and (theoretically) opening the door for more cheaters. Saying "players can't play our game because every match has a cheater" is just as bad.
I can't say which has more weight but it's not a cut and dry situation, at least until Linux has anti-cheat.
Right now developers could make an "unattested" queue for linux and other non-TPM windows systems. Which could also serve as a black-hole for cheaters, so maybe there's some value in that.
To chime in, arranging things in fixed locations on the desktop has proven to be quite helpful for elderly people when doing support ime. It is easier to remember/tell "the globe icon in the top right" than "Type 'Firefox' in the search bar".
Also has the nice side-effect of avoiding MSN news on Windows.
If you like tech (sw dev in particular based on the roles) enough to do it but can't motivate yourself to do it for a job, consider making it a hobby and changing careers. Don't ruin your passion by making it a chore.
Jobs that are "low effort" are rare, usually you need one of:
- time: job is time consuming (think monitoring cameras for N hours a day)
- physical: job requires physical work (think sorting boxes in a warehouse or janitorial work)
- skilled: job requires certification/skill (think electrician or engineering)
- social: job requires interacting with humans (think customer support or sales)
Depending on you skillset/preferences select one or two and search for vocations/jobs. Jobs usually have a mix of them (and there are likely some more categories). Jobs always require effort, that's why people are paying for it. If you want to reduce time look for "part time" jobs.
If you are fine with mid-low pay, take a look at jobs in public institutions (Education, Government). They tend to have rather good long term working conditions and are commonly open to people changing careers into public service.
That seems pretty overzealous, companies like SAP or Heinlein are doing well-ish and the recent push for digital sovereignty has induced some money. There also is a bunch of mixed shops (doing he and software or integration work).
The primary difference is that many expect on-site and they pay is generally not US-startup scale.
Many companies also expect you to at least have some knowledge of their local language (e. G., German, Spanish or Polnish) and not just English. One has to adapt to be competitive here.
The other comment already answers part of it, there is no real need for it for a NixOS system as you usually either can consult the store on the machine (and recursively build a graph of a all transitive dependencies of a generation), have a system that stores the config along with the generation (option `system.copySystemConfiguration` or a flake-based system will store the config in the store itself).
A system that has neither a store nor the config (container image) not easily reconstructable as you miss too much metadata.
> Not being forced to buy ram and storage is one of the "luxuries" of buying framework.
To be fair at least Lenovo and to some extent dell also offer this for individual customers.
It usually is not an option on the latest processors for premium models though as soldered RAM becomes more prevalent there. A minor problem of the author might be that they are looking at the relatively high tier models, which ime have less options for "saving" money, while something like a thinkpad e14 might also have been a good candidate instead.
reply