I like upscaling and frame interpolation but as always, the TV does not have the hardware to do a good job. If you use neural network models, it works and looks a lot better without looking plastic-like.
Interesting. I knew another user who spoke similarly to you about the web (often exaggerating of the "wonders of the web" while WASM and similar technologies were the signaling of the "dark times"), are you an alt of rektide? It seems like they stopped posting just as your account was created, which leads me to believe so. Just a curious observation, as they too were on threads related to the web.
50% of under-21 college students engage in underage drinking. The number for of-age students is even higher. 44% use cannabis. We can safely say that those two groups overlap significantly, but barring people who consume either dramatically cuts back on your potential pool.
Per my experience, I can't attest to that of cannabis, but the percentage of students drinking alcohol underage is significantly higher than 50% in every college I have heard of or visited.
Some people are using it for serverside, ie the dartfrog library. It's a decent enough Algol language for backend, better than Go I'd say due to having ADTs and exhaustiveness matching.
Scroll down on the post, not the comments, and you'll see where the parent pulled their quote from, which you said you "don't see any of that written there," well, it's written there.
I'm honestly at a loss for what you want from this conversation. What "nonsense" are you even talking about? You said you don't see the quote written there (I presume on the website) so I told you to scroll down and you'll see the quote. That's all I was saying, but now you're asking what the point of the quote was, like, how should I know? Ask the parent.
>Their statement is pretty clear about what they see as the value add
And add a quote to support that.
I argue that I do not see what the value added is from that quote, (and I still don't, btw).
You tell me to scroll down ... ??? What? I don't need to scroll down to read a 4-5 sentence quote.
You then start talking about the article, which is not what I'm not referring to, I'm talking about the quote.
I ask "what's the point of the quote then?", as in, if GP wanted to point its argument at something else in TFA why would it choose to quote this instead? And you also didn't grasp that.
Flagged because it was an unsubstantive comment as dang mentioned and also that it's increasingly a flame bait topic on HN, same as with Copilot and licensing.
