Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more cguess's commentslogin

Webster and a few other folks tried. It just didn't stick.


The problem here is people die when those things are removed even for a few weeks or months. You don't get to "put back" security for SSN data when it's already been accessed by foreign governments. He's not doing this in good faith, he's convinced he's the smartest man in the world and should literally be a dictator.


It's fine, it won't hurt Musk himself. All these wild experiments are perfectly okay from his perspective because, to him, there's basically zero risk.


> You don't get to "put back" security for SSN data when it's already been accessed by foreign governments.

"Good" news then, this is already the case! Or should very much be assumed to be the case, following the various GSA hacks.


[flagged]


>I believe he is acting in good faith and the result will be a much more efficient government.

If he's acting in good faith then where is the transparency he's promised? Taking Elon at his word is, at this point, naive at best.


That's not an edge case. Cutting services that people depend on to live will kill them. That's a guarantee.


The difference is those were private platforms not giving a soapbox to certain politicians that were quite clearly violating private terms of service. This is the federal government deleting taxpayer-funded content, data and studies. They are not similar in any way and to imply otherwise is a disingenuous comparison.


Ruby and Rails (together or Ruby separate). ~18 years on both.


Pro photographer here: The best way to tag someone as an amateur is if they look at a photo and ask "what lens was that?"


As an amateur (who did a bit of paid work in his youth) I still look at photos I like and wonder what lens was used.

I don’t really care about the brand or model but I like to know the settings. Ie aperture used, max aperture, focal length, etc.

Was very subtle flash used and if so what was the placement and mod, etc?

I just want to know how it was made.

Even with shots from people like Cartier-Bresson where he almost always used the same lens, film and settings. I still wonder if anything changed.

I don’t miss all the arse sniffing, snobbery and inverse snobbery involved in photography though.


My father was a professional photographer. He was also a professional asshole so his response was always to respond with the shittiest worst lens he could think of and see if they bought it.


Funny, but professionals do it quite often. In all professions people do talk about their tools and exchange their experiences. Quite usual.


oooooh 2004 burn! Relevant!


You can intercept and modify messages on the fly. This helps a lot if you want to update legacy code, but don't want to break other classes that use the same call. It also allows for modularization more easily. I have a project that receives data from a bunch of sources, so I have a class for each source (this is simplified). To make it much easier to add a new one, which happens pretty regularly, the code that calls the processor checks all the classes in a specific folder for a certain function (`.respond_to?`) and then gets the right one for the data type. This means that to add a new source I have to change 0 lines of legacy code, just drop the new class file in the right place and it works.


Because libraries are often used by the people who can least afford it. They offer resume classes, ESL, computer literacy, some will even have collections of clothes that can be borrowed for job interviews. Libraries should be a public service, not a private institution.


I understand what libraries do, but one doesn't preclude the other. Not for profits and charities are basically a one-way funnel of money from people who have it to people who don't, modulo not for profit salaries.


The developers that made Google and Facebook and such were highly paid. The people who were hired for a dollar an hour to train the anti-CP models most certainly were not and have instead suffered horrible trauma.

Externalities are so easily ignored if they don't happen in SF (and even the ones that do. For instance, take a look at the pricing out of affordable housing for all the cooks, dish washers, janitors etc who cater to that highly paid workforce but now have to commute hours each way).


Mate, I'm nowhere near San Francisco.

Just because San Francisco is disastrously run despite staggering riches and has horribly magnified problems does not mean it's the fault of people who started companies in San Jose.


You don't see a connection between tech CEOs who hoard vast wealth, and a public sphere starved of real investment?


The US government spends 10 trillion dollars year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_spending_in_the_Uni...

That's larger than the GDP of all but two countries in the world.

That is not starving.

On top of that, tech CEOs and highly paid tech workers pay a lot of tax. Far more than they cost the country.


and a lot of it is directly funneled to crony's of the current king...

I doubt DOGE will recommend cuts to SpaceX funding.

I need to remind you that Mush has invented nothing nor is he an engineer. His vast personal wealth is extracted, and at least part of it's vastness is due to corruption. Mush's personal views expressed on his own-media-trumpet Xitter, have hampered more technological innovation than he has ever enabled or paid for.

BTW what's SpaceX carbon footprint like? This 'man' also just paid for a slice of the US presidency that just pulled the US out of a global treaty to attempt to address human-caused climate crises that are unfolding in front of our face on a daily basis as predicted. Mush has done net harm to Earth, not good.


Each Tesla sold in the USA gets a $7500 subsidy. That is the company's entire profit and more.

SpaceX has received $15 billion in government contracts.

I don't think either company would exist without government support.


It's really funny to watch a bunch of people contradict the US Navy when it comes to navigation at sea. No, a cell phone isn't going to work in the middle of the Pacific and no, the US Navy doesn't use Google maps. Go get on an actual boat sometime and sail out of sight of land, you lose cell signal way before you're even over the horizon.


A cellphone's GPS only relies on the network for a quickstart. With no network, it takes longer to get the initial fix, but then works perfectly fine.


> A cellphone's GPS only relies on the network for a quickstart.

The point is not to rely on GPS/GNSS:

* https://gpsjam.org


Not always true. I have devices with GPS which not only relies on a network for getting ephemeris data for the satellites, but they can't function without it. In other words, they don't even try to get ephemeris data through the GPS signal. So, if there's no network, it doesn't work. One of my devices is even a tablet without a SIM card, it only has wifi.. so if I'm near a cafeteria with wifi I can get a fix, and keep it for a while, but without it it's totally stuck. Forever.

In any case, as others have said, in the ocean a cellphone is useless for navigation. At least use a standalone satellite navigator. And learn to use paper maps and a sextant, it's actually a lot of fun.


Ships do use GPS and so do phones and other devices. What exactly are you trying to say?


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: