I think partially dismissing the question due to the bill happening "under trump" doesn't help the conversation here. If the bill was sponsored by particular reps/senators, then it's worth identifying those, so their voters can factor this bill in to their decision to vote for/against in the future, etc.
Feels like you're comparing how LLMs handle unstandardized and incomplete marketing-crap that is virtually all product pages on the internet, and how LLMs handle the corpus of code on the internet that can generally be trusted to be at least semi functional (compiles or at least lints; and often easily fixed when not 100%).
Two very different combinations it seems to me...
If the former combination was working, we'd be using chatgpt to fill our amazon carts by now. We'd probably be sanity checking the contents, but expecting pretty good initial results. That's where the suitability of AI for lots of coding-type work feels like it's at.
I hadn't considered that, admittedly. It seems like that would make the information highly likely to be present...
I've admittedly got an absence of anecdata of my own here, though: I don't go buying things with ingredient lists online much. I was pleasantly surprised to see a very readable list when I checked a toothpaste page on amazon just.
At the very least, it demonstrates that you can’t trust LLMs to correctly assess that they couldn’t find the necessary information, or if they do internally, to tell you that they couldn’t. The analogous gaps of awareness and acknowledgment likely apply to their reasoning about code.
Another comment mentioned along the lines of, "it's the goto used by developers in readmes", and I suspect it's more specifically javascript-adjacent developers (as is the case where I work)
The "render locally" situation was enough friction to keep me happy with my .jpgs and .pngs generated from various sources and/or screenshotting.
I don't know if this helps you but the Mermaid plugin in JetBrains has an export feature which can save you a step. But I find Mermaid diagrams so limiting and the syntax more immature than PlantUML so it's very rare that I bother
The "in readmes" is a special case because the markdown rendering in both GitHub and GitLab support it without drama
> You need to be strategic about where you live (e.g. buying the house ...
I wonder what % (presumably low) of the population can live in SFHs and achieve this cities like Seattle.
I should try finding if there's available work that's made visualizations of this sort of things ("How many homes could be within X miles or minutes of A B and C" for SFH, Quadplex, 5-over-1s etc.)
You aren’t exactly going to find an SFH in the suburbs that is much cheaper. So you have a point, but you have to choose between an SFH, a similar priced townhome (basically an SFH without a yard), or a condo with an HOA, all basically unaffordable unless you want to commute from Kent or Marysville. Seattle still has density (the townhome I live in in Ballard is one of three that used to be one SFH).
Curious: what is an example of a robotics servo motor with one-directional control?
My experience around such started with pwm hobby servos, includes dynamixels, and I've worked with larger stuff using harmonic drive gearboxes. Can't recall encountering a "servo" that is one-directional.
PWM-controlled hobby servo (1-2mS pulse evert 20mS or so) is the one-directional control I had in mind. When you are under $100 range a surprising number of servos use the same simple 1-wire protocol, even large-ish 150 kg-cm / 100W units.
Dynamixels are two-way, and they are an exact thing I'd wanted to see in search results.
Ahh, you seem to be referring to two-directional (two-way) communication, and I took it to mean rotational direction. Was imagining servos analogous to devices that simply power a motor in on/off states, so can't reverse.
I haven't regularly bookmarked sites in a decade or more. The bookmarks are in my head, and I can live with the Omnibar mostly reliably surfacing the things I didn't finish, and later recall and want to pick up.
That said, I'm pretty sure the Omnibar is buggy at finding tabs. I inevitably have several tabs to gmail "open". It ought to be a lot easier than it is to find /return to the last-used gmail tab, and not one of the several from previous browsing sessions. :)
Windows are a good solution, except, MS Windows (my home desktop) makes it not a good solution.
I'm pretty sure the ordering of my 4 firefox windows used to stay fixed (i.e when clicking the tray icon, and seeing the 4), but this stopped being the case a few years ago for me.
So I live with 3-4 windows; I don't think having 10 windows would help me because their arrangement is not consistent.
(I hover between about 600-1100 tabs open; I do cleanup when I notice I'm near or above 1000; I don't reliably do cleanup after e.g. opening 5 ebay tabs and deciding what to buy; nor do I reliably finish using those ebay tabs in one sitting; multiply that by the dozens of things I might be researching/comparing, going back many months :) )
(I keep my work Linux laptop Chrome browser to under 50 tabs, and often don't bother restoring tabs after my laptop is rebooted)
> It was Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which amended IRS code.
And took effect in 2022 (per what I've read elsewhere, and other comments on this post; could be off by a year)
(just clarifying that the effect was "a few years ago", but I agree that it's important to know the origin of it, which you were pointing out)
reply