Would love to hear more info on how you actually vibe coded this as the fishbowl seems incredibly cool

I imagine a cool way to get users to notice your tool would be to scan public Github repos with many followers, and comment on the code vulnerabilities.

Yes, that's exactly what we do. Some examples: https://github.com/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT/pull/2650, https://github.com/dagster-io/dagster/pull/30002

We just need to follow responsible disclosure first by notifying the maintainers, working with them on a fix, and making it public once it is resolved.

You mentioned one of your use case is outbound (can totally see this being perhaps your biggest opportunity): How are people using this for outbound? As a full-cycle AI sales agent?

Yes exactly, we have some cases where people built a fully autonomous AI SDR

Onboarding/signup started off great, but then you just drop in with no clarity on what to do next. A lot of actions possible and I'm unsure what to do first.

what confused you? happy to help - shoot me an email at adi(at)agentmail(dot)cc

Impressive demo, just wish I didn't have to request a demo and could just sign up.

Request a demo button also does nothing other than change the text on success - not sure if it even went through...

I got the demo request:) Let me reply to you

Super confusing signup flow. I paid, but didn't get access? [email protected]

We've built something like this at Helpjuice.com - we call it Swifty AI Chatbot. It's pretty cool to see companies that are building a completely open platform that works with all. Nice work folks!

Upvoted – looking forward to supporting you guys more

It's not a good look to piggyback off competitors' launches like this. Let them have their moment.

From what I could gather, they're also shifting the responsibility of due diligence from a government to a company ?

The keyword there is responsibility. It's a reasonable approach - taking some workload off government immigration bodies to speed up the process, and it saves the taxpayer money because the costs of background checks would fall on the company doing the recruiting.

Companies recruiting foreign talent would likely need to register on this programme and will have to do their due diligence when recruiting - perhaps subject to fines or prosecutions if they fail to do proper checks. I can't say for sure as I can't read the proposal.

How does it compare to Algolia?

The short answer is: we're better at recommendations and personalization and lean towards more technical teams (e.g. even with data/ML experience). They're better at traditional search and, these days, lean towards less technical teams.

Longer answer is in our blog post about it: https://www.shaped.ai/blog/shaped-vs-algolia-recommend :)

Cool! Any live demos we can try?

Yes play.shaped.ai! We just opened that up in a gateless way for this post. Let me know what you think. I should also mention that these demo models are on our cold-tier so that it doesn't break things, in production there's a big speed up.

Just tried your product. It's brilliant. 10/10. Super easy to understand – just wish your explainer video actually used the product instead of being those cheap caricature videos :-)

Appreciate it!

We wanted the video to explain the concept moreso when we started b/c that's what users seemed to have trouble understanding

But perhaps we need to update it as this has become more common

If you ever want a demo just book on the site with me!