Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hello1234567's commentslogin

spot on.


it's a not a waste of time but imo it's also not going to be disrupting. it could be a good sounding board when you know the subject otherwise it's mostly useless. it does makes things convenient but how much value it add, that's yet to be seen.


Generative AI is a wonderful tutor.

Source: I'm a teacher.


in uk, good thing is, if you do get to see the doctor, you don't have to pay anything but the tricky thing is "getting some one to see you".

on average, system is good for bottom half but system is pathetic in terms of services after paying such high taxes.


person writing this came to know some thing that he din't know earlier and decided to convert his light bulb moment into a blog post. not bad bad but failed to understand that logs are the generalisation of very thing they are talking about.


all is good. companies will be able to hire some good people with the compensation that was unthinkable few months ago. compensation convergence to the mean is the inevitable in the long run.


there is a different way to achieve the same results. instead of encoding every possible rule into classes, a combination of flex box-classes, templating and text props could be used. <flex container> <li #if index % 3 ####css-prop> </li> <other cases> </end-container>

there is some repetition, but it will keep things simple.

same thing for spacing example, have a margin prop on a flex box container and apply it on each container then wrap them into a flex container.

it will be easier compose to compose vs css class variation.


well nuclear is the current cheapest way of producing electricity. doesn't stop from funding other cheaper and future safe options.

mantra is cheaper.



Always was. The most reliable product of the nuke industry has always been dishonesty. "Too cheap to meter..." No nuke has ever been operated anywhere in the world without massive subsidy.


Can you name one type of electricity generation that operates without government subsidies?


yes. current medical science is having issues treating simple thing with humans (paralysis or any thing related to it ). solving aging, may be in next 500 years.


Solving aging isn't the sum of all other cures.

It could be just another track of medicine we haven't really begun to formalize correctly


"Humans overestimate progress in the short term and over estimate it in the long term."

You're discounting the law of accelerated returns. It might take another 50 years to make a "big discovery/milestone in curing aging" but from that point forward it might become a lot easier to cure aging.


what a fucked up assumption that every should understand the game. what if i don't like games. never played one but also never had any issues with calculus. well i can say it's a f** up thing dum people needs gaming to learn maths.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: