Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hutattedonmyarm's commentslogin

I don't think it's fair to call them "strange" personal beliefs


It probably depends on your circle. I find those beliefs strange, seems like moral relativism.


I personally would call them ignorant beliefs.


> The losses are concentrated in tropical moist broadleaf forests in countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo, Madagascar, and parts of West Africa, driven by deforestation and forest degradation

If I read this correctly: No, forests are not suddenly emitting carbon. People are just felling enough trees and treating them badly enough, that their forests are now dying faster than they are regrowing


What horrendous title. Quick! They are emitting carbon! Cut the forests down!


I’m not sure I understand why the headline is wrong.

Whatever the reason might be, the point is that African forests have gone from absorbing more carbon than they release, to releasing more carbon than they absorb.

IOW, they have become net emitters as opposed to net absorbers.


One could argue the forest itself hasn't started emitting carbon, its the loss of biomass due to clearing that has had a net reduction in total biomass.


While technically correct, I think your comment is disingenuous and distracts from the issue.

You're right that the forests themselves are not emitting carbon. However, human deforestation is causing the sequestered carbon in the trees to be removed from the forest and that is also reducing the forest's ability to absorb carbon.

TFA

> their forests are now dying faster than they are regrowing

> ...driven by deforestation and forest degradation.

Due largely to deforestation caused by humans.

A search for "logging in congos protected forest" will reveal numerous articles on this:

> Despite the ban on new industrial logging, the DRC has one of the highest rates of deforestation in the world, losing 490,000 hectares (1.2m acres) of primary rainforest in 2020, according to Global Forest Watch.


There is a top level comment taking the article's wording as meaning the trees have evolved to emit carbon because of the confusing wording. I think it's a very helpful comment to clarify what the article is trying to say, not a distraction from it.


> Call me bad at parties, but a dedicated app for inviting people to the party is too much fanfare for my taste.

I agree. We threw a halloween party. We just discussed who we wanted to invite and threw everybody together in a whatsapp groupchat to announce the thing.


Same, but either Signal or plain ol' SMS depending on the group.


it's still correct and should be at least accepted as such, even if not explicitly taught


I'm very happy with Overcast. It does show ads for other podcasts in the now playing screen if you're using the free version. Premium is a subscription, but it's like 10 bucks a year. That's perfectly okay. And to be honest, I rarely look at the "now playing" screen anyways


price recently increased to $14.99


Based on my experience and not hard data: Not most, but still quite a few. Some jobs more or less require an apprenticeship (carpenter and other handy jobs). Doing an apprenticeship for a job and afterwards going to university also happens a lot


It‘s Copy On Write. When you modify either one it does get turned into an actual copy


Reeder on iOS / macOS: https://reederapp.com/classic/

With Inoreader as backend: https://www.inoreader.com/


Another vote for Reeder. Very nice app and note that you can use iCloud as the backend and don’t need a separate service.


True, but I want to use RSS on non-Apple devices as well. So I was looking for something with a web interface. That’s also why I’m still using the classic version


I also really like Reeder but use miniflux as the backend


This is what I use as well. It's not perfect but it's the best I've tried so far.


On the preorder page they're talking about the "URSA Cine Immersive":

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicursacine...

which seems to be more in line what the article talks about


> Has this happened before? That iPhones had a security hole that could be exploited over the web?

IIRC yes. Back around maybe iOS 4-6ish a web-based jailbreak existed, don't remember exactly when


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: