Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | khoobid_shoma's commentslogin

I asked ChatGPT that if it can replace Google search engine. It says :

"As an AI language model, I do not have opinions or personal thoughts. However, it is unlikely that chatbots like ChatGPT will replace traditional search engines like Google in the near future. While chatbots like me can provide quick answers to specific questions and engage in conversational interactions, they still have limitations and are not as comprehensive or efficient as search engines like Google. Google and other search engines have access to vast amounts of information and use complex algorithms to deliver relevant and accurate results.

That being said, chatbots like me can complement traditional search engines by providing an alternative, more conversational interface for accessing information. Additionally, advances in natural language processing and AI technology may lead to chatbots becoming more sophisticated and capable of handling more complex tasks in the future."


Axiom: Human rights + Oil price = 0


Norway?


It's easier to say goodbye C++!


C is 10 years younger than COBOL, C++ is 20 years younger than COBOL, COBOL is still around.


A full rewrite seems extremely expensive and long. I’m afraid C++ isn’t going anywhere in our lifetime.


C++ can stay, but people can make a decision not to use it for anything and not to take any jobs involving C++ (or other systems/bare-metal-ish languages).


I've written a fair amount of C++ in my day, and this seems totally unacceptable to me.

Also my opinion seems unpopular on this topic, so I suspect some group of people that really want to get behind C++ don't like that kind of talk.

Whatever though. Rust and other newer languages are kind of giving the spaces C++ works well in a run for its money and in other ways just completely blowing it out of the water in my opinion.

It might be time to look at D again too.


It's more easy to just don't adopt the new standard.


Propaganda


Was it necessary to use Ninja?


The best approach is bash + cmake + ninja + github actions with a single main.c /s


I hope more laptops be listed in the future...


Yeah, that's unfortunate it does not support UEFI out of the box.


> "Let us consider the following C++ code:"

But, C code is shown. I do not get why people tend to avoid using C name.


If it's compiled with a C++ compiler as C++ then it's C++ code. In this example the meaning is the same but some "C code" will produce different results depending on whether you compile it as C or C++.


It's compiled with a C++ compiler ('_Z2f2i' in the disassembly) and the function name is 'f.cpp', so I suppose it's in the 'C is a subset of C++' part of C.


Still that's C code. Code is an input to the compiler. So, I would not call the code differently just because later a C++ comiler is used. In C++ code, we expect C++ specific features be used.


The title is a bit misleading. This is about extending C grammar used in D.


The numbers do not say what is really better. It just reflects responders' opinions.


> It just reflects responders' opinions.

That's why they called it a 'Developer Survey'.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: