I consider China one of the most developed countries from an engineering and process perspective, and most suited to import trash for energy generation compared to ecologically and socially unacceptable alternatives due to potential harm to the environment and humans. If trash will be generated, it must be disposed of, and it can be responsibly managed by importing for energy, I see no issue.
China's already selling waste incineration power plant tech to other countries. They can build their own plants to handle their waste.
In China, these power plants are part of the urban waste management system, they are built to process trash, not to generate profit. As a waste disposal measure, their capacity must exceed the city’s waste production rate; otherwise, garbage would pile up.
In 2020, Wang Liqiang, a man convicted of fraud in China, applied for political asylum in Australia, claiming to be a Chinese spy[1].
However, the video of Wang's 2016 trial and the verdict had been publicly available online for years[2].
In the 1980s and 1990s, Australian agents bugged the Chinese embassy on behalf of the United States, an incident reported by the ABC in 1995[3]. Photos of the bugs in the embassy building were widely circulated online[4].
Not to mention the antics of bugging other countries' embassies[5].
>A referendum was held in April 1975, where over 97% of voters supported abolishing the monarchy and joining India.
I know you are trying to express that the annexation is supported by the Sikkimese... But referendum is by far the worst tool you can use to support your point. Even more so, when South Asia is notorious for election rigging.
By the same logic, Crimea should "rightfully" be under Russia's rule.
> I know you are trying to express that the annexation is supported by the Sikkimese
Do you have any sources that say they don't support being part of India ?
> Even more so, when South Asia
Indira Gandhi imposed emergency in 1975 and lost in 1977. If there was widespread election rigging she wouldn't have lost the election.
> By the same logic, Crimea should "rightfully" be under Russia's rule.
Can you point to a separatist movement from the people of Sikkim, 1975 to today ? Without that, your comment just doesn't make any sense. You come across as CCP shill.
As someone who has been to Sikkim and spoken with people there, I can say they are proud and happy to be Indians. In fact, they receive several concessions from the Indian state for being part of the Union - for example, they are exempt from income tax. While a referendum may not always be the best measure of sentiment, the absence of insurgency in Sikkim (unlike in some other regions in India) suggests that people are broadly content with being part of India.
