Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mrkramer's commentslogin

They offer "spying" services for your big data. Essentially something like Facebook and Google but without selling ads, instead spotting patterns that seem interesting for whatever reason.

I often compare China to the British empire: ruthless autocratic capitalistic dictatorship.

Payment ecosystem is so complex and convoluted that it is hard to tell. I was using my Visa card for years on Steam and all of a sudden Steam started refusing it. Steam support was repeatedly telling me that the problem is not on their end but on my end. At the end I figured out that I need to enable Visa 3D Secure feature on my credit card because I assume Visa was seeing a lot of fraud from Steam so they started requiring 2FA for Steam payments.

Also Bandcamp.com refused to accept the payment from my credit card and I contacted my bank and they told me that payments to Bandcamp are always blocked because of security reasons(that is their policy) and they had to manually approve my credit card for use on Bandcamp....which is totally fu*king crazy. Manually approving payment transactions in the 21st century is wrong. How the hell should I know which vendors are on my bank's blacklist?!

Tbh or at least that's my impression all comes down to the problem of fraud and crime. That's why we still have shitty payment providers and processors.


Cryptocurrency like Bitcoin can probably be made by LLM so if you have a good idea for cryptocurrency or some crypto token and you can vibe code it with LLM, perhaps it can reach a $1bn market cap.

One bug and the value crashes to 0 though

We're definitely closer to the one-person billion dollar company than bug free vibe coded software.

I mean... you can just copy/paste BTC or ETH software, name it differently... or get ERC721 and name it something.

Software itself will not make people use it.


Ironically enough rampant piracy turned out to be the best method for preserving history because that way thousands of people have x or y thing on their hard drive stored and preserved in decentralized fashion. One way centralized archiving is fragile.

I don't understand why somebody didn't fork the Wikipedia and build the version where you can self promote. It kinda sucks that you are not allowed to claim and edit your Wikipedia page.

They did. It's called 'DNS' and you can set up a 'page' about yourself if you want.

It doesn’t kinda suck.

Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopaedia, which means it’s intended to come with some expectation of neutrality.

If you could edit your own page, do you really think it’d stay as factual and as neutral as possible?

Just make yourself a website.


I'm sure someone did.

Facebook and Instagram are too cheesy, I want something more genuine.

There's this wiki (I forget the link sorry) that always gave me the impression that it was made by people disgruntled they were turned away from wikipedia for original research, that's full of original research by self-styled experts. I'm sure you could write an article on yourself there, after all who's more an expert in yourself than you?

The only viable and useful alternative to Wikipedia that I found is https://golden.com/ (it somewhat loads slow for me but it is useful.)

Often when I search for startups and their founders I can't find information about them on Wikipedia but I find it on Golden.


It's incredibly telling that the alternative you seek is a for-profit firm built on datamining other site's data without permission...

>without permission

If it is without permission than it is illegal and people can sue otherwise web scraping is legal.


How is it genuine to write information about yourself in such a way that it seems crowdsourced?

My idea was to have Wikipedia like platform where you could write about yourself and then have your friends, family and colleagues confirm that information or vouch for that. You can even turn things around and give permission to your friends, family and colleagues to write and maintain Wiki page about you.

I don't use LinkedIn but when I stumble upon someone's page, I often see testimonies from their work colleagues about them.


I doubt Google and Facebook are any better but the catch and the question is; how to measure awareness of ads e.g. if I see an ad and it sticks in my mind but that doesn't show up in advertiser's ad campaign analytics? Raw stats are one thing but awareness is another.

Maybe screen on your eyes(AR glasses like Zuck wants) or chip in your brain.

No I want my YT vids and AI summaries! /s

Yahoo wanted to be internet's hotspot for everything....ironically enough Google become that despite the fact that they rose to power because of their minimalism and search focus.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: