Can you upload some most interesting deleted YT videos to Web Archive or even Dailymotion, so that they are preserved for the next generation?

Easy solution: use YT in a web browser with an ad blocker (like uBlock Origin or AdGuard on iOS).

In many cases developer e-mail address changes, IP address changes, billing address changes, tax ID changes...

This exactly. Transferring ownership is a business transaction. Track that. If the new owner is trying to hide it, this is fraud, and should be dealt with in court.

There are: GeckoView and Gecko Embedded, so it's doable.

Which roughly nobody uses.

But it's doable.

It's not minimum. Custom WebKit builds could weight less, depending on features. Also Sciter is more lightweight.

I've compared Servo with Ladybird and the latter uses 3x more RAM for the same website: https://fosstodon.org/@niutech/114139305720083599

So Servo is more lightweight than Ladybird.

Chrome is still bigger than Servo. For a really small size, go for Sciter, Netsurf or Dillo.

For rust desktop apps, why target a web engine, when we have much more lightweight native GUI frameworks? We don't need yet another bloated Electron.

One nice thing about targeting a web engine is that your application could potentially run in browsers too. Lots of Electron applications do this.

Also you get to take advantage of the massive amount of effort that goes into web engines for accessibility, cross-platform consistency, and performance.

Electron is a memory hog, but actually very powerful and productive. There’s a reason why VSCode, Discord, and many others use it.

But yeah, I wouldn’t say no to a native Rust desktop stack similar to Qt. I know there are options at various levels of sophistication that I’m curious about but haven’t explored in depth.

If it runs in a web browser, why bother Electron if you can just install a standalone web app in Chromium-based browsers (or Firefox with PWA extension)? I do this with Slack, Teams, Discord, Gmail and they use less RAM since they reuse a shared web engine.

Some applications benefit from the host integration. VSCode in particular, since it interacts with the terminal and other applications. I'm also assuming 1Password benefits from it as well for full OS integration.

But then they don't need to be made as Electron apps, but rather native apps, which use a fraction of resources. Compare e.g. Sublime Text or Notepad++ with VS Code.

But then they wouldn’t work in the browser.

There’s certainly a place for truly native apps, but there are also a lot of reasons companies keep picking Electron. Efficiency is just one consideration.

They could, using Wasm, like Qt, Blazor Hybrid, Uno Platform, Avalonia.FuncUI. Electron is efficient for devs, but inefficient for users, being a memory hog, especially on low end devices.

They could do that today, but do they? I can’t name one app that uses one of those to run in a browser. I can name multiple highly successful apps that use Electron.

I seriously doubt the approach of running a native desktop application in the browser would give you performance or usability as good as running an actual web app.

Servo also publishes weekly reports on Mastodon: https://floss.social/@servo

As for modern TUI browsers, there are already: Chawan, Browsh, Carbonyl.