Charging past 80% is a waste of time. The fuller the battery the slower it charges. It’s much faster to stop twice to charge half of the battery than to stop once to charge 100%.
Ah, but charge to 100% gave us time for a quick lunch while charging on road trips. Now slackers like me don’t have enough time to finish before we need to come back and move the car.
It depends on your battery capacity. With a 50-60kwh battery, you will get less than 200 km from 80% to 20% at highway speed, which could render necessary to charge to 100% to get safely to the next charger in a situation where the charging network is not dense enough.
Back when they had their own rendering engine I've tried using it for a bit, just to give a non-Chromium rendering engine a chance.
But now that it's nothing but a slightly outdated Chromium clone, there's technically no reason to ever use it.
And because Microsoft keeps escalating their sleazy and desperate tactics to forcefully shove Edge against users' will, I'm making a point to never use it again. This brazen level of anti-competitive underhanded behavior with Edge reminds me that Microsoft is still as rotten as ever, so I'm also avoiding other Microsoft's products like VSCode, Azure, and I'm very worried about my dependence on Microsoft's GitHub.
This is wildly inaccurate. Technically speaking it is considered by many to be more optimised than chrome and in my experience it is the most performant browser (at least on windows).
Of course that doesn't mean I use it as my daily driver. It's lack of other features and my distrust of MS mean that I use Vivaldi as my daily driver. Which also happens to report the UA as being ms edge on bing.com so that Bing AI can be used without edge.
OTOH everyone right now is fighting for Nvidia's GPUs, and I bet (ex)OpenAI people know exactly what hardware they'd like that would be best suited for their task.
> know exactly what hardware they'd like that would be best suited for their task.
Thats the fun thing about AI hardware. By the time you develop it (which takes years and billions), the workload you're targeting is already changed or obsolete.
Nvidia is the exception because if you are an AI scholar, you are building your research around whatever capabilies Nvidia GPUs have. Thats why AMD and Intel have quite literally chosen the "emulate Nvidia" path and axed more specialized accelerators.
Cargo already supports using git repos as package sources, but it's painful to use due to slowness of the git protocol. HTTP registry updates are nearly instant in comparison.
If git was the only option, most people would probably just use GitHub, which is merely changing one big host for another.
When it's actually decentralized, when developers use their own git URLs on their own domain, suddenly you have to worry about things like the domains expiring. You have to worry about security practices of every single host. crates.io is a big target, but they know it and act accordingly.
crates.io doesn't allow deleting of packages, but an arbitrary git URL can disappear causing a "left-pad" incident.
Some of these problems could be solved with another protocol better suited for decentralization (where the data is immutable and content addressable, and identities are private keys rather than domains), but that's way more complex than "just use git".
What's shocking to me that producers were simply adding a lead colorant on purpose. I thought the challenge would be from some hard to avoid environmental pollution, or a complex chemical process going wrong. Nope, it's just lead paint.
It's a problem like the prisoner dilemma. It's beneficial to the country that "deflects" and gives a discount, but makes everyone worse off than if all countries held line on a higher tax rate.
(disclaimer: I mean it from a direct perspective of maximizing tax income. In this comment I'm not getting into the deeper economics/politics/philosophy of whether higher or lower taxes are better overall).
