Its possible that Andrej Karpathy could have been hired for scaling his vision on the auto-research repo. (His version of "AI that builds itself")

Indeed, the simplicity and structure behind RSS perfectly fits agentic AI. Web 4.0 (or Web 5.0) would definitely use a protocol whose principles might be similar to RSS.

In order for rocket launches to reach 1000+ per year in a decade, we need more innovations and business models in launch pads. 18 months to restore a launchpad is going to hamper progress significantly. We need to build as many launchpads as we can and allow private companies to rent them. Ofcourse each rocket design and their launchpads are intricately coupled by various factors, and this would make building generic launchpads a bit difficult. But the oppurtunity and necessity exists nonetheless. Blue Origin would agree until the next 18 months.

I'm a layperson when it comes to launchpads and aerospace but "we need to build as many launchpads as we can" seems quite spatially demanding? With all the public push-back around data centers and large fulfillment centers it seems an uphill climb. I am genuinely curious to the constraints here as, additionally, I read an article about the large environmental impact of SpaceX (?) debris falling onto public land in the outside vicinity of their launch area.

From environmental, staffing and practical standpoints it may make sense to condense the launchpads in a single area. Just spitballing here and am curious to learn more.

They don’t have to be too far from each other.

Another option would be to standardise on a launch pad design and make the rockets to match it, perhaps with a set of adapters for ground systems. This way, if you accidentally decommission a pad, you can build a new set of adapters and use any other pad that follows your “Unipad” standard.

Standardizing is not quite simple. Each rocket is different from each other. There are many reasons why launchpads are intricately designed as per specific rockets. examples like The type of fuel used, the pipelines that supply them until T-0, the reusable capabilities, sound suppression system, rocket and payload weight, etc. But if standardization is indeed achieved, then all the more victory for the spacefarers!

I know it’s not simple. This is why it’d need some deliberate imposition of requirements - this would harm the players with most dedicated platforms to benefit everyone (including the people paying to launch their things).

I am not sure why NASA hasn’t imposed the requirement that Dragon, Starliner, and Dream Chaser should all be able to launch from each others booster.

Yes, I meant the same. Basically, I called for expansion of existing spaceports and a handful of new ones. They will be closer to the coast as always with the launch paths facing the ocean to avoid debris falling on the population.

Genuinely impressed with the article. We need more such articles that re-invigorate our engineering curiosity. Kudos!

How not to flex:

"MAI-Code-1-Flash outperforms Claude Haiku 4.5"

The two-tower Mixture-of-Transformers design (autoregressive reasoner feeding a diffusion generator) is an interesting architectural bet.

The interesting design question here is whether unifying GUI and CLI operation in a single agent loop actually improves performance or just makes the benchmark story cleaner.