Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ranger_danger's commentslogin


Is it really humourous if you're not already racist/misogynist though?

There is a well known connection between humor and fear. One does not need to feel racist notions to feel fear about, and therefore laugh at racism.

"I was just joking" is the excuse you tell yourself to say those hateful things and to escape consequences. Just look at Trump "joking" about canceling the election. It's a "joke" so there are no consequences, but where's the damn punch line?

The punch line may well be that he wasn't joking after all.

He really needs better writers then - that punch line is lame enough to fail the bar for even late night shows.

He does not joke. I don't think that he knows how.

Yes. I remember there was a whole phase of a meme of a black person in a suit with the tag “how I saw black people before 4chan” and some horribly racist after picture.

I’d say people fall somewhere in between 0% and 100% bigoted and what they will tolerate/laugh at can be incredibly nuanced. Nobody is actually 0% or 100% racist but I generally consider myself “not bigoted” in a broad sense. Everyone is of course carrying some bigoted opinion(s) though, it’s unavoidable.

But back to the point: I’d say I am by and large not particularly bigoted. Still, I’d be lying if I said I have never laughed at off-color jokes. No matter how progressive or anti-racist you are something is going to break through. That is what makes it such a powerful tool for less scrupulous actors. You find what a person or community is willing to tolerate, then you either peel off people in private or push boundaries out loud and slowly drive a wedge into the community.


> Dark mode is stupid fad that should have never been

There can be other valid perspectives than your own.

The article even explains legitimate reasons for its existence, without resorting to uninformed dogmatism.


I would say the issue itself is almost irrelevant... I think it's mainly your dogmatism. Speaking in absolutes as if you always know everything, that there can seemingly only be one right answer and there can be no other valid perspectives or opinions. To me it just screams low emotional intelligence and a lack of critical thinking, humility and empathy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology)


Their revenue last year was 400 billion dollars... you tell us.

They are still milking the product they launched 20 years ago, doing slight periodic updates to match innovations of others with few years delay. They are about as good at making new products as Google and Facebook.

have you seen the M chips? to me that revolutionized computing. supercomputer-level latency for in-ram operations on a $2k laptop

I'd say it depends on your definition of "good", since the revenue seems to suggest they're doing something most people agree with.

By that logic, the online scam industry is shipping the best products of all time. By some estimates they make over a trillion a year.

IMO false equivalence... scams are designed purely to steal money from people, while Apple products carry intrinsic value and benefit to most people.

I realize it's a strained equivalence, but Apple makes a lot of money violating EU anticompetitive laws. Their stranglehold over app distribution is not entirely dissimilar to ransome.

I remember working with him on the iphone back in 2007, he was always like this.

They're probably referring to gnome's history of controversial opinions that many users don't like, such as:

- "simplifying the UI" by removing many useful features (like systray icons)

- "what makes you think sharpness is a metric?"

- claiming fractional scaling is dumb because "monitors don't have fractional pixels"

- "we know what users want" while ignoring most user feedback

- "we're not copying mac OS" while blatantly doing so

- "consistency is key" then changes entire UI paradigm every release

- "what's the usecase for <insert well-known feature>?"

- intentionally obscuring how to access / in the file picker

And in general just being incredibly tone-deaf and abusive to their own users on the forums. Torvalds has been calling out their "users are idiots and are confused by functionality" stance for over 20 years now.


> You can hide and ignore the folks you mention

How?


The addon uBlock Origin has an option for rules to change HTML and could be used for this [1]. Replace Username with the persons Username. add to My Filters. I encourage people that dislike or often find themselves disagreeing with or being activated triggered by me to do this for my username.

[1]

    news.ycombinator.com##tr.athing.comtr:has(a.hnuser):has-text(/\bUsername\b/)

There's a userscript called 'HN Blacklist' that can hide/filter content from users, titles and sources: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43282379

Every day you make comments that are downvoted (and probably flagged) by several people... I think it's quite possible that the real issue is not "other people."

Usually people who feel (or are) targeted are not 100% innocent.


There's a clear pattern where comments containing certain words are flagged much more often than comments containing mildly cens-red versions of those words. Could be HN itself but if we assume HN isn't lying about how its algorithm works (a big assumption) then it must be user flag bots.

It's not just my comments - you see something similar with headlines on the front page that contain certain names like El-n M-sk. They will accumulate hundreds of points and comments and then be cens-red.


Uniqlo Ultra Light Down Jacket

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: