> but isn’t suitable for the everyman due to its complexity and associated costs.
Complexity, sure. But for most people, the cost of Netflix, Spotify and whatever will quickly add up to a 500usd server. With 1-10 users you don't need much.
Poster child for this would be the Space Shuttle/747 kit (which I kind of wish had gone back to the drawing board for a few more revisions.... but I'll probably get it anyway).
I was at a talk recently where a person from an ad supported streaming provider broke down their cost/revenue as part of the justification for some of their engineering decisions.
Basically you're lucky to get ad revenue of 10c per hour.
I see it as capitalism eating itself. When some field is rather streamlined and mature and optimized cutting corners is where to increase profits.
An analogy would be brands profiting from their good brand image. I.e. they decrease quality to change brand loyalty into dollars.
"The issue I see with the whole regulation debate is a complete lack of context from politicians and decision-makers. Perhaps it is by design?"
Go attend some party meetings if you want the context. Usually the reasoning is clear. I don't know why people expect politicians to be able to reach out to them unilaterally. The participation rate in politics is too low nowadays for gossip to spread.
Most ideological death marches I have witnessed in my party have also been accompanied by lack of debate due to unilateral threats of de juro or de facto expulsion by some sort of manufactured consent that seems to come from nowhere.
Exactly. Broken ideologies and populism break down very fast in the face of proper debate, but that debate needs to be had and broadcasted very very loudly and broadly; Otherwise it is drowned out by the unchallenged propaganda.
reply