I picked up on it very quickly as well. Here are some more phrases that match that same LLM pattern. Sure, you could argue that someone actually writes like this, but after a while, it becomes excessive.
- Your program continues running with a corrupted heap - a time bomb that will explode unpredictably later.
- You’re not just getting 64 bytes of memory. You’re entering into a complex contract with a specific allocator implementation.
- The Metadata Mismatch
- If it finds glibc’s metadata instead, the best case is an immediate crash. The worst case? Silent corruption that manifests as mysterious bugs hours later.
- Virtual Memory: The Grand Illusion
- CPU Cache Architecture: The Hidden Performance Layer
- Spoiler: it’s even messier than you might think.
There will now be a CEO (Chief Executive Orderer) who will statistically balance fastfood orders during times requiring late nights to maintain normal public-facing order activity.
Or their boss will tell them to order "anything but a pizza . . . You all saw the website!", so it becomes an inverse indicator.
I believe it's because the actual text behind the font would say "Here's a statementam-and here's a diversionam-and back to the original statement."
Problem is, it's only useful if you're using those specific fonts. Now I've gotta teach my grandpa how to install a font and switch to using it on every single device and application.
Just only use this in output where you also control the rendering, the font can be included in a PDF or with a website. This is for when you publish, not for emails as I understand it.
I love osdev. I don't know what the end game is for me, but there's something really cool about being able to just create... whatever I want. It all sort of clicked for me when I was able to get some basic x86 interrupts and syscalls working. Once you get the syscalls going, the world is your oyster!
Seriously, I would highly recommend tinkering around with a hobby OS. I used it as an opportunity to learn Rust and I got more than I bargained for. Now, I feel somewhat comfortable in Rust AND I can throw more double and triple faults than most people in the world.
I remember the commercial for this. It was very dramatic in promoting how CueCat would change the world, but in a sort of cheezy techno-futuristic setting.
What is the competitive landscape looking like these days for Rust web frameworks? I couldn't help but feel a bit insecure last time I was exploring the various options because none of them seemed to have the maturity or longevity of frameworks from other languages (for obvious reasons).
Is there one framework that stands out from the rest from an "investment risk" perspective? In other words, if my company is going to choose a framework to build a website, which one has the lowest odds of burning me by becoming abandoned or unsupported?
I would say pick Axum or Actix, these are the go to right now with lower risk to be abandoned, But they aren't batteries included. Here is a list of blessed[0] libraries that might help you to choose the most popular ones in their respective category, but at the end depends on you to pick the one that has the biggest community.
Axum is most likely to be supported long term since it has quite a bit of support and is a Tokio project but it's not nearly as batteries included as something like Rails or Django. I doubt any of the current batteries included Rust
web frameworks will last.
- Your program continues running with a corrupted heap - a time bomb that will explode unpredictably later.
- You’re not just getting 64 bytes of memory. You’re entering into a complex contract with a specific allocator implementation.
- The Metadata Mismatch
- If it finds glibc’s metadata instead, the best case is an immediate crash. The worst case? Silent corruption that manifests as mysterious bugs hours later.
- Virtual Memory: The Grand Illusion
- CPU Cache Architecture: The Hidden Performance Layer
- Spoiler: it’s even messier than you might think.