But you can only see replies to tweets if you're logged in; so thank you for providing that link, but currently, that's the only way that those of us who aren't logged into Twitter can find it.
Not only can you just replace twitter.com with nitter.net, I bet there's a browser extension you can get (or generate in 1 minute with any LLM) that would load any Twitter link into Nitter.
Plenty of people put their content behind paywalls, but apparently, someone who puts theirs behind a free loginwall is a bridge too far? I'm not sure I understand the outrage.
I can't stand Bluesky, but I have an account on it. What the fuck is the big deal?
Usually they have volunteers who do maintenance. At my local tool library the tools are well-used, but there's also like 10 of everything so you have lots of backup options.
most places i’ve borrowed things will seek some basic assurances that i know what i’m doing, first.
for example, when i borrowed a MIG welder, the person at the space asked me to weld some scrap metal in front of them before they let me loose with it.
This is easier than many assume: If you can find the Discord or even an e-mail for your local makerspace and send them a photo, they might urgently send someone to pick it up from you if it's useful to them.
Climate action and renewables has always been very popular with voters. Since political action has consistently lagged popular support I'd suggest that you'd need to look outside elections to see what is holding the west back on this.
This is just a talking point put about by climate deniers since dealing with climate change is cheaper than the alternative.
It's no different from Fox News headlines saying Medicare for all would cost X billion and not mentioning that business as usual would cost twice that.
An attempt to turn a popular, cheaper option into a scary bogeyman with selective lies.
if you're going to list the strengths of china, one of the biggest ones is unironically having leadership that doesnt get interrupted in massive ways every 4 years. i'm not going to debate the negative parts of that, clearly it is also problematic, but despite the negative aspects it has factually largely contributed to their strength and prosperity
> From December 2024, coal power generation declined for five straight months before ticking up slightly in May and June, mainly to offset weaker hydropower generation due to drought. Coal power generation was flat overall in the second quarter of 2025.
> The chart below shows growth in monthly power generation for coal and gas (grey), solar and wind (dark blue) and other low-carbon power sources (light blue).
> This illustrates how the rise in wind and solar growth is squeezing the residual demand left for coal power, resulting in declining coal-power output during much of 2025 to date.
What they are doing is ensuring energy reliability and phasing out old nasty coal plants in favor of modern ones expected to have peaker like capacity factors.
The numbers I've seen aren't currently far worse, with the US producing slightly more CO2 per capita than China. But the trend is there to make it eventually far worse as we maneuver to be bass-ackwards.
What are those low-power devices (can you identify any?) doing with XSLT, then? If they don't have the power to do the transformation, it seems pointless for them to possess the template needed to perform the process.
i don’t think you’ll see this at the typescript level, and you won’t see anything like this that compiles to javascript. specifically, compiling typescript to javascript with runtime checks would not actually be very useful.
typescript is pretty ambiguous about a lot of the things that would need explicit definition for runtime safety, and anyways we already have tools for that - it’s called zod.
and comprehensive checks would incur a significant runtime penalty, unless they were restricted to external interfaces, which is what you’re really concerned about. we already have tools for that - protobuf, swagger, etc.
anything else is sharing a runtime with you. so either it’s in your ide, and you just don’t write shitty code; or you’re trapped in some kind of demonic javascript prisoner’s dilemma, and you are mutable.
so typescript is basically ‘good enough’ for developers.
thinking forward anyway, and assuming you’re really willing to share a runtime with a stranger…
node doesn’t really operate in that kind of context, but maybe browser code does. i could imagine a framework based on web components, workers, and maybe iframes, taking advantage of message boundaries to enhance analysis and conceal code generation. it’s not that much better than typescript.
but if you want efficient runtime checks, and you want to leverage static analysis and strong module boundaries to scope the type-checking codegen, and you probably need additional syntax, you might as well target wasm.
Yeah, but Zod and all of the runtime schema libraries all kind of add verbosity to the type system compared to say something like Typia[0] which AOT compiles the type checks (and ends up being way more elegant).
Caveat is that there are some restrictions with the compiler and some possible footguns (duplicated declarations bloating code).
