My employer has never allowed remote work and likely never will. They have private offices for all developers and insist on the unmeasurable value of in person work.
I don't love it, but I at least respect they are upfront about it and are consistent vs flip flopping and impacting people's lives unexpectedly.
They do not know what R and D is, let alone what is does. One guy bankrupted a casino and saluted a North Korean General, and the other tried to impregnate a couch
Quite right, I'm sure. But the part that I'm more interested about is why it feels like the floor got so much lower? I don't know that the average interaction in public (in any context, not just flying) is any or substantially worse, but it seems like the variation to the downside got more extreme.
Why should criminals who flee law enforcement feel safe? They broke the country's laws. Trespassed the borders of a country! Doesn't matter what nice people some of them are. It's called crime. There's a big gate for entering the country legally for anyone who wants to feel safe.
>>> People are starving to death and the world's brightest engineers are ...
>> This is a political will, empathy, and leadership problem. Not an engineering problem.
> Those problems might be more tractable if all of our best and brightest were working on them.
The ability to produce enough food for those in need already exists, so that problem is theoretically solved. Granted, logistics engineering[0] is a real thing and would benefit from "our best and brightest."
What is lacking most recently, based on empirical observation, is a commitment to benefiting those in need without expectation of remuneration. Or, in other words, empathetic acts of kindness.
Which is a "people problem" (a.k.a. the trio I previously identified).
I don't love it, but I at least respect they are upfront about it and are consistent vs flip flopping and impacting people's lives unexpectedly.