What’s wrong with it if they studied the codeGPT solution well enough to explain it, answer the questions about corner cases and suggest improvements? Won’t it be a good indicator of the candidates skills? ChatGPT is one of the daily tools nowadays, we should not ban it, but the one using it should be able to understand and explain the code, and his logic, and explain how he architected the solution and how the LlM assisted him, and where it worked well and where not so good.
If they can produce working code that solves the problem, and explain how it works, that is more than “just com[ing] back with the ChatGPT answer.” I'm not saying ChatGPT doesn't have its own issues, but this is not one of them.
I've had candidates who successfully did this to explain how a SQL JOIN works. But I'm not looking for candidates who can read a GPT prompt; I'm looking for people who deeply understand how a join works.
In my country delivery guys always phone you and knock on your door to give you your package. If you are not at home, they will get the package back and try to deliver it the next day. I’ve never heard of an option to ask them to just leave the package outside.
I also haven’t touched CS 1.6 for 15-16 years, it will be cool to try it. Is it possible to run it on Mac M1 or I need a VM? Also, can you recommend any resources where I can read how to setup and configure bots? TY!
I've been using this to play TF2 Classic on my M3 MBP and it works perfectly. I had some freezing-while-sound-skips-endlessly issues when using the voice chat hotkey, but that was resolved using WineTricks (built in to Whisky UI) to install `dsound`.
e: And I also had to disable macOS's default keyboard layout switching shortcuts (which I never use anyway) since I kept triggering it while crouch-jumping lol
Back in the days on lan parties there was what we called "the russian version" that only had question marks in the installation dialog (Because of unsupported fonts most likely) which had Z-Bot included.
