This is the sort of thing where artificially generated samples work well. Spawn a random set of blocks, run a physics engine for a bit to have them pile up, add random lights and render to an image. The renderer can also give you a ground truth annotation for each pixel to the corresponding block type.
Without going into a debate whether this statement makes sense or not in absolute terms, it seems to make sense in some people's heads, as differences can be measured across different groups in the 500+ user population.
The very purpose of this game is to measure biases and perception, not reality
Since it is based on perception, and many people perceive themselves as outside the binary male/female categories, shouldn't the first question about my gender give me more options than just male and female?
"ABSTRACT. The vast amount of product information available to consumers through online
search renders most advertising obsolete as a tool for conveying product information. Advertising remains useful to firms only as a tool for persuading consumers to purchase advertised products. In the mid-twentieth century, courts applying the antitrust laws held that such persuasive
advertising is anticompetitive and harmful to consumers, but the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) was unable to pursue an antitrust campaign against persuasive advertising for fear of depriving consumers of advertising's information value. Now that the information function of most
advertising is obsolete, the FTC should renew its campaign against persuasive advertising by
treating all advertising beyond the minimum required to ensure that product information is
available to online searchers as monopolization in violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act."
This makes the argument that the need to convey product information is now fully accomplished by search engines, and advertising only adds harm / manipulation.
It recounts several examples of internet self-righteous mobs lynching people for minor and larger offences.
In particular, one conclusion of the book is that aggressively not making amends for bad behaviour, even raising the bar for offensiveness, is the optimal survival strategy. See Trump ...
