Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more stan_rogers's commentslogin

It is the One True Screw, amen.


Can I interest you in the Torah of Torx?


Torx rather sucks in comparison. Sorry if the truth hurts.


Still better than Phillips.


most things are.


It's literally called a dummy load - to the 'lectrics, it acts like an antenna, but it doesn't radiate or receive.


Actually getting condoms used to be a highly stigmatized pain in the ass back in the "caveman" days in large swaths of the world (especially in large swaths of the US). You came up in a very different environment.


Not really. You just didn't want everyone knowing you're having sex. Especially in small communities.


"Fourteen" (four and ten) would have been from "scoring numbers", where you get to twenty (a score), keep track of the scores separately, and start over. Up to twelve, we used a duodecimal/dozenal system (a separate word for each number). That was also common in other non-Germanic Indo-European languages, notably the Brythonic Celtic languages (and various versions of Brythonic scoring numbers are still used in parts of Britain, depending on the pre-English dialect spoken in the area and changes over time, especially in children's games). French numbering still shows signs of "scoring", especially in the 60/70 and even moreso in the 80/90 region.


He never said most of the things he said.


That's a Yogi-Berraism right there. In about 40 years it will be attributed to him. ;)

In these two cases, he said them, but was far from the first.

From https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/12/06/future-not-used/ on "The Future Is Not What It Used To Be":

> In conclusion, Paul Valéry, Laura Riding, and Robert Graves used the saying by 1937. Based on current evidence Laura Riding and Robert Graves deployed the phrase in English first. Yogi Berra and others used the expression in later years.

From https://quoteinvestigator.com/2014/08/29/too-crowded/ on "Nobody Goes There Anymore, It’s Too Crowded":

> In conclusion, the earliest instances of this remark were anonymous. The comedians Rags Ragland and Ukie Sherin employed the quip, as did the writer John McNulty. In addition, there is some evidence that Yogi Berra employed the joke, but in all cases the jest was already in circulation.


It made a difference long before Casio calculators, when tables were your main source of values (that would be this old fart's day). You could argue that as long as you stuck to the same table set, it doesn't really matter - but tell that to the decibels.


It's not just in Canada. Have you ever heard the term "grand theft auto"? There have been two levels in almost every jurisdiction for a very long time: petty (small) theft and grand (large) theft. The dividing line in England used to be a shilling, for which you could be hanged or transported. Sixpence would get you a short-ish time in gaol/jail.


The story is about a crime in Canada, so it's relevant.


True, but the separation between grand theft and petty theft exists in pretty much every common-law country, and has for centuries - it's not a peculiarity of Canadian law.


...and flagged. It shouldn't just be a panel/plug, there should be a ginormous length of red webbing attached with a "you can't miss it" "REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHT" text in white (on both sides of the webbing) as well. It's not like we haven't been doing that for fifty-plus years or anything. That was old news when I was in the service [mumble] decades ago and our quaint training films on type were nearly twenty years old at that point (which should be a clue right there that I'm Canadian).


Perhaps the millenials in charge of designing this most recent fighter tired of your grandfather's rain cover aesthetic, and modernized them to feature Hoefler Whitney and more muted colour palette. :-)


I mean, there are certain lessons that each generation seems to have to learn anew.

It just that one would expect this to not be one of them.


Someone tell Elon...


VLC doesn't do gapless. That disqualifies it as a reasonable music player.


Geodesics usually have flat panels as well - flat panels of limited size meeting at odd angles, yes, but flat panels nonetheless - that allow you to use conventional furnishings against or nearby to walls without unusual visual gaps in at least a few places. "Real" domes, on the other hand, not so much.


As the frequency goes up it starts to approximate that dome better and better.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: