Disclaimer:

I am not fluent in English, so I have included my comments via a translation tool. Therefore, I may offend you with inappropriate language expressions. I apologize in advance.

Thanks for your comment. I can see how it could be used successfully for those types of books.

Thank you very much for your thought-provoking comments.

I actually sympathize with you very much.

As you say, there is a non-zero chance that this app will contribute to a lack of concentration, but I cannot dismiss the possibility that the opposite will happen.

In my case, I have often found myself wanting the crutch of LLM due to lack of prerequisite knowledge when reading technical or philosophical books.

Also, I am an Asian whose English is not that good, and there are times when I have to read a book in its original language because there is no translation in my native language.

This application was created on an experimental basis to remove these panes, and the chat function with LLM is only one function. It should be used at the appropriate time depending on the user's use case.

I don't agree with the OP, AI assisted reading is the future, especially when you're trying to read a tome like War and Peace and don't know all the Napoleonic references or thst the Russian aristocracy spoke French and tried to emulate the French, or why that matters a lot to the plot and your perception of them.

Good job, OP. I wanted to build this myself.

Do you have plans for android and iOS support and syncing across devices?

Thanks for your comment!

> Do you think it is possible to make it phone friendly and easy to install?

Yes, it is possible. The app supports PWA (Progressive Web Application) and responsive design, so it can be used on mobile by deploying the source code from this Github repository to a cloud environment.

Since this app was originally built exclusively for myself, I have not deployed it to a public cloud for external users to use, but will consider deploying it if users want to.

Another idea is that since this app is OSS, users can deploy it to the cloud themselves.

Thank you for your comment. As others have pointed out, there is a non-zero chance that it may lead to a decrease in concentration, but the reverse may also be true. I think it would be better to actually try it and see if it fits your skin or not.

Thank you for your consideration of my feelings.

I think all your points are spot on.

Especially “You can't just define something as a problem merely to help you sell a solution.” is really spot on. It made me pause.

I think it's fair to say that we created this product to test whether LLM can improve the traditional reading experience. And currently, I feel that LLM has somewhat improved the reading experience of technical books.

Thanks for the feedback!

> That said, I do understand (and share) a lot of the frustration and hesitancy that people here have around AI tools

I share some of the same feelings as well. As for use cases where it can provide value, I think it can be of value if you want to read difficult academic, technical or business books with deep understanding. I think so.

> Right now it seems there are still a lot of manual steps and scaffolding.

I think you are right. I originally planned to use it as a tool for my own exclusive use, so I was able to build an environment with minimal implementation costs, but I didn't expect to get so many comments. I will improve it!

I am really glad to hear you say that. It's very encouraging. There is still a lot of room for improvement in this application, so please feel free to give us feedback if you have any complaints after actually using it.

I am glad to hear you say so!