Its possible that ai was used for this summary section, which isn't as scary as you make it. It's def scary that ai is used in a legislative doc at all.

Correct, but yes as you point out in the second half, I don't doubt that if they're using it for summaries then they're likely using it in daily work.

This is so cool! It's a little clunky on the phone, but I had a great time. Thank you!

Thank you so much! Means a ton.

Totally agree - the mobile experience need a ton of work, I'll try to figure out a better UX.

That was probably the plan. Except they probably expect a higher fluke rate.

Well, people need an alternative to CG big tech. This fits the narrative really well, and was just the tipping point to a growing disdain towards Autodesk.

I do anthropomorphize other things like builds, etc. I guess it's natural.

And also it's something programmers need to be skilled at.

Yes. But also, probably just about every language will have a module with these functions. Python's NumPy and SciPy should have all of these built-in.

Or, it could be no one at all!

If you go back far enough (and I don't know if this is) isn't the answer always everyone or no one but never "some".

It might happen when the pop media allows for it. It's very easy to belive the the Govt and all media are in symbiotic cahoots w each other.

It's easily possible that this was overlooked because when being in on the scam one will be less diligent about such things.