Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | thierryzoller's commentslogin

They point to their comparison page to claim similar quality. First off it's very clear that the details are way less, but worse, look at the example "Three-quarters front view of a yellow 2017 Corvette coming around a curve in a mountain road and looking over a green valley on a cloudy day."

The Original model shows the FRONT, the speed version shows the BACK of the corvette. It's a completely different picture. This is not similar but strikingly different.

https://flux-quality-comparison.vercel.app/


"teahcing in the age of AI." ?


Spell check wasn't invented in the 15th century, and is clearly proto-AI;)


"15th centurary professors"


Probably intentional as a flex that they didn't use a GPT to write or proofread the article. XD



Notice that with the higher ranked car brands you usually get two years or more of "special service" on purchase. Something along the lines of "for any problem just call this number and we will help you immediately!". That's how they don't show up in the statistics because the brand itself will handle it and not - like in this example - the ADAC. My company even has a compliance form you have to sign before getting a car from the pool to agree to not call ADAC or similar at any circumstance, no matter the problem. Always call the given brand number. Reason is to keep their statistics low (and in exchange our leasing prices ...)


But why?


What strikes me is the comment on 3DS challenges that passed. By law in Europe, once 3DS challenge is completed the Bank owns the risk and cost of the chargeback NOT the Online Shop. Can someone tell me how this is implemented in common processors ? Any experience?


One word: throughput


What strikes me in this "comments/rebuttals" is that they mostly miss Moxies' main points and underlying critic. Some comments are pretty obvious and certainly understood my moxie...


Yeah, didn't fine the hash in that JSON


Luxemburg’s Data Protection watchdog refuses to show its teeth to US companies. noyb files court case


In a recent letter, the CNPD further clarified their argument as to why they don't investigate the several breaches of the GDPR (Legal Basis, Purpose, Transfer, EU Representative) for thousands of Luxemburgish (and hundred thousands of European) citizens. Highlights are mine.


Your data is wrong. You estimate 10% of all tests are positive in Luxembourg. That's utter BS. We have tested more poeple than our population and have done multiple testing. The quote is around 1-2% and not 10% as you claim.


This[1] is their source description for Luxembourg. Following their "country profile" link from there, their source seems to be saying around 1% positive test rate for Luxembourg[2].

So it's not clear where the 10.8% figure comes from. I'll try contacting them at their Contact Us email address [3] and see where the difference is coming from.

[1] https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing#luxembourg

[2] https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-19-daily-tests-vs-d...

[3] https://www.microcovid.org/contact


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: