I was at a conference years ago in Burbank, wanted to walk during lunch break as I was tired from all the sitting and was stopped by the cops also. They were super friendly, offered me a ride but couldn't understand why I'm walking (especially without some destination). It's a really different mindset from Europe.
> I feel like scrutinizing the industry for a 2-3% error on an obviously difficult problem is exactly why we pay so much in the United States for health care
All research I’ve read on this topic finds that it is the US legal system that causes the crazy prices (incentivizing more testing to cover-your-ass and avoid liability etc.)
Many comparative studies on health care cost and quality use the US military as a proxy, as it is free on the condition that you cannot litigate (very coarsely; it is more nuanced).
The costs for treating US military personel is much closer to other countries (while treatment quality remains equal).
That is a factor but a relatively small one. Several US states have instituted limits on medical malpractice liability and that has had only a small impact on total healthcare system costs. It's often the patients themselves (or family members) who insist on trying every possible diagnostic test, and even with the growth of evidence-based medicine we still don't have clear clinical practice guidelines covering many of those situations.
It´s not just the legal system. A lot of US Doctors are typically paid on a piece rate basis, and the medical records systems are extremely fragmented, so there is an incentive to order repeat tests (as you get passed around from specialist to specialist), and no incentive to put the systems in to make that unnecessary.
> So you can always just allocate more physical pages to the stack as needed, similar to the heap.
You set the (max) stack size once when you create the thread and you can’t increase the (max) size after that.
Processes see a virtual address space that is handled by the OS, so you would have to involve the OS if you needed to add to the stack size dynamically.
After process start and it's initial state, the stack is just another virtual address and the just sp another register. It can be mapped, remapped, changed to point to whatever. With overcommit even the initial state may not be entirely backed by physical pages.
Many userspace apps already do custom stack handling, it's how things like green threads work. And many non-native runtimes like .net already have custom handling for their managed stacks, as they often have different requirements and limitations to the "native" stack, and often incompatible formats and trying to isolate from possible bugs means there's less benefit to sharing the same stack with "native" code.
It sounds like you think OpenAI is a profitable business? As far as I understand, it’s not.
OpenAI is projected to generate $12-14 billion in yearly revenue in 2025 (annualized from a single month), but expect to lose around 8 billion USD, implying the margins are negative.
OpenAI has raised a total of ~$60 billion.
I think they need to show investors a huge and growing cashflow to keep the show going.
OpenAI has a subscription revenue stream that's more than sufficient to keep current basic operations going. It is losing money because most of that money is spent on research, more and more GPUs, very expensive people and other capital expenditure.
Of course, they can't just retreat to selling their basic services since some other company would train and produce a marginally better model.
So it's a paradoxical situation. They're moving in contradictory directions - both to become a thing so valuable they'd only need to sell subscriptions and towards a mote if they don't reach that "AGI" thing. No reason being flexible would displease their shareholders but there are many other questions to answer here (who gets AGI raptures, who gets the Skynet/Terminator treatment, who decides, etc).
The valuation of OAI would be peanuts if it stopped reinvesting too. Which will destroy the value of equity and therefore employees certainly wont be happy.
Im not really sure where Altman is going. As time goes on, it seems the walls are closing in and he's just throwing all he can to keep the hype alive.
You cant escape fundamentals forever, I dont care who you are.
Around the skiing season, many automotive magazines will remind diesel drivers to buy “winter diesel” or use additives if e.g. driving up to the Alps or similar cold places.
> They might be in meetings or pouring over documents all day
FWIW it’s “poring over” when reading carefully.
From Merriam-Webster
“As a verb, pore means "to gaze intently" or "to reflect or meditate steadily." The verb pour has meanings referring to the falling or streaming of liquid (or things that move like liquid).”
Denmark, but being dutch vs danish is very commonly confused/conflated in the US :D
reply