Is GSAP still widely used today?

Yes it is! It was acquired by Webflow a few months ago. They made all its extra features free. I specialize in GSAP. It's common to see it used with three.js or SVG on high-profile sites.

Didn't know, cool.

I think it's also just ugly to be honest. Completely opposite of Apple's values of focusing on one thing at a time and even basic grid alignment. And I am an Apple fanboy....

> they could exfiltrate your data through the same connection that they're using for their legitimate purpose.

their traffic can be monitored. They can secretly exfiltrate if they hide it, use pin certs or use some custom encryption. This should be a red flag

> Should password managers just store all of your passwords in cleartext instead of encrypting them, since you should be using FDE?

Better analogy, should every random app bundle own custom crypto and encrypt all files and ask user for password just in case some user does not set login password?

An app should do what it does, if secure storage is not its task then it probably should leave it to the os and if it's not DNS resolving then it shouldn't DNS resolve. Is very annoying

How do you deal with pinning which most apps do now?

i hate it. hsts mixed with doh exist to take control, and transparency away from users, because most users never knew they had the option to begin with.

I just noticed that OP actually noted GLP in a later comment.

Just more evidence that HN downvotes/flags often mean actually you're right and people just feel too butthurt about it.

Firefox in strict mode should be unaffected?

I try to avoid meds usually but sometimes gotta wonder if people who flag+kill comments about GLP or steroids are just thin and buff people who lucked out on genetic lottery and secretly want to maintain their superiority.

Like why, gene editing a baby is okay but if your gene expression sucks and your parents couldn't afford crispr you now are to suffer the entire life from body dysphoria and bringing up an easy way out is to be silenced or stigmatized?

What are downsides exactly? The rich do these things all the time right?

I think deep inside of people, the truly miraculous drugs like GLP-1 are subconsciously rejected because they are seen as an attempt to cheat God.

> Like why, gene editing a baby is okay but if your gene expression sucks and your parents couldn't afford crispr you now are to suffer the entire life from body dysphoria and bringing up an easy way out is to be silenced or stigmatized?

Because when I do it – it is Gods gift/destiny/I deserve this/whatever other bullshit reason to maintain my edge, when you do it – it is because you're weak/just train like others do/you don't deserve it/whatever other bullshit reason why it is your natural place to be there.

There was a comment recently how it is "cringe" when you're investing in your looks and learn how to date, because apparently if you weren't born with innate ability to attract – you're supposed to stay this way and be miserable forever.

Missing "Aircrafts land", the shortest falsehood.

Which aircraft don't land in one form or another?

Spacecraft are aircraft. Voyager hasn’t landed.

Voyager hasn't landed yet.

Touchdown on water, on an air carrier, rapid disassembly in air

Infinite flight with in air refueling

Get stuck in trees or sufficiently big building

Change ID while flying and land as a new aircraft (also makes "aircrafts take off" a falsehood)

Seaplanes, loitering munitions ("suicide drones")