Too vague yes

It is nature that demands labor for survival, not society.

Society has been gradually diminishing that demand, and may theoretically be in the position to remove it entirely, but such a state of affairs has never existed.

There's you who insisted on a FAANG job to make 6x more than you probably need and then there's me living on 1.5k a month because I refuse to do anything that feels more than 1% useless (i.e. most things in the enterprise). I'm not saying my attitude is better than yours, but I do think you didn't really need to grind leetcode if you really didn't want to do useless things

In other words, MCP is RESTful (as in, it has HATEOAS) and "REST" is not

Prices are about communicating almost more than they are about prices...

Not the one you're asking, nor the one you meant to ask, but I find it rather objectionable that we are now restricting the production of new memes in academia to the ~25% that is most aligned with a moral fashion that is patently hostile to intellectual freedom. It's good to be willing to consider DEI like any other idea but to endorse it is a clear indication that you only care about truth insofar that it is socially advantageous to do so. You're basically unfit for the job at that point.

This whole answer hinges on knowing that 0 is not a positive integer, that's why I couldn't figure it out...

She's a physicist. LLMs are not for creating new information. They're for efficiently delivering established information. I use it to quickly inform me about business decisions all the time, because a thousand answers about those questions already exist. She's just using it for the wrong thing.

Or maybe the stress-reducing effect carries over to the next day?

Stress has a habit of not being randomly reset to the default value every morning when you wake up

To me this statement looks like, they can't really make bold statements, so they make vague ones instead