> Hiring is the primary source of dilution at new companies.
Is that true? Generally don't companies set aside ~5% of the company for employees? Even the first 5 employees probably get a combined total of less than 10%, whereas the first investors probably get 10+%.
Is that true? Generally don't companies set aside ~5% of the company for employees? Even the first 5 employees probably get a combined total of less than 10%, whereas the first investors probably get 10+%.