> Or just people with money should be allowed to have access to content?
>>That is the case for pretty much everything non-digital and schools and education as well and thus an entirely reasonable position to take.
Please explain to me how "just people with money should be allowed to have access to content" being "an entirely reasonable position to take" doesn't fit into that?
He explicitly said your position is "a reasonable position to take". You appear to be so set on being against people, you are seeing things they did not say.
I am arguing that though the position is reasonable, the ad industry as we know it is a piss poor answer. Poor people paying with their privacy is bad.
>>That is the case for pretty much everything non-digital and schools and education as well and thus an entirely reasonable position to take.
Please explain to me how "just people with money should be allowed to have access to content" being "an entirely reasonable position to take" doesn't fit into that?