Can I get a supporter of BTC/BCH explain to me why it makes sense to do this on those blockchains rather than on a blockchain with actual Turing completeness, such as Ethereum?
There have been some other answers, but I’ll add first, people may just want to bet BCH - if it’s possible to do, even with a limited instruction set, why not figure it out? Second, turing completeness is not a panacea, and as we’ve seen now several times, the expressiveness of Eth’s VM actually opens it up to more bugs.
BCH has less users than ETH. I think the interest is that transactions in BCH are very low, and there are talks about enabling some 0-fee transactions:
An important difference between BCH and ETH is that ETH has a lot of opcodes, but BCH is slowly enabling some of the opcodes that were created by Satoshi but later disabled.
because in bcash land they can convince the miners to include tx's with 1 satoshi fee, so they can bloat their chain with all kinds of junk like yours.org Good luck doing that in ethereum land.
Your "'wrong' is wrong" is wrong. Yo can verify transaction history with an SPV wallet.
A full node won't help you against an eclipse attack. And also not against a sustained 51% attack since miners can mine empty blocks on the minority chain, halting it.
A full node is good for increasing your privacy, disguising what addresses you're watching, but that's all.
