Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It very much has many factual errors pointed out by historians several times since its publication. If you're truly looking for an objective account and not something to stoke emotions and tell you want you want to hear, I think you're better off reading an actual history.


Define "What you want to hear"? It's someone's perspective, which is valuable.


As Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan famously said, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: