If you really want to understand the HN community (or online communities in general) this data doesn't tell you much.
There are many interesting questions this data cannot answer.
When was each of those 39 points gained?
Who upvoted?
How many points did the submission have when each comment was posted?
How does the number of points affect the number of comments?
Are there cascades of votes (several users voting in quick succession)?
For each of the comments, who voted up and who voted down?
I don't think the actual HN "database" has that much info. You would need to reconstruct this from the complete server logs, along with application logs for PG's direct updates (assuming he doesn't use the web interface)
It has to at least know who upvoted, to prevent revotes.
HN has to know who voted, not which way someone voted. HN doesn't let you change your vote once its been made, but it does let you downvote once you have enough karma.
I don't think this would work well. The occasional false-positives would look like annoying glitches, every now and then making it look like your account had been hijacked by hiding the buttons as if you had already 'voted'. Although maybe I'm not getting the math right?
Also, the existence of the 'saved stories' link from the user page would seem to indicate that for stories at least a full list is being stored.
I think it would have been neat if someone created a browser-extension that let users contribute such data, but I guess preventing abuse could prove to be an impossible task, since there is no way that I can think of for a third-party to check whether the user really performed an action without having to perform those actions for the user, in which case we would have to trust our login-details to that third-party.
