Do you think browsing in the terminal would be a hassle for people?
No. the basics of the site make this close to zero cost and proof-by-example is the alternate textual views of the site which just work (tm)
I am trying not to be a google fanboi, but the ubiquitous consistency of keyboard accelerators in gmail, photos, docs, &c by google is one of the reasons I enjoy using their tools. They "get" keyboard warriors, in the browser.
I like that. I feel similarly towards apple products. The consistency of these google products &/or the seamless-ness of apple products means that I can focus on what's important to me.
Good tools feel like good tools. Had to re-read,"ubiquitous consistency," nice. Thanks for the value added.
No. the basics of the site make this close to zero cost and proof-by-example is the alternate textual views of the site which just work (tm)
I am trying not to be a google fanboi, but the ubiquitous consistency of keyboard accelerators in gmail, photos, docs, &c by google is one of the reasons I enjoy using their tools. They "get" keyboard warriors, in the browser.